Edwards Katie L, Pickard Abigail, Farrow Claire, Haycraft Emma, Herle Moritz, Llewellyn Clare, Croker Helen, Kininmonth Alice, Blissett Jacqueline
School of Psychology and Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 May 28;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01768-x.
Avid eating is an eating profile which confers greater risk for childhood obesity and can be challenging for parents to manage. Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), we have previously shown that parental mood, feeding goals, and eating context determine parents' use of coercive and indulgent feeding practices. Parents have also reported using specific noncoercive practices which provide structure (e.g., modelling) or autonomy support (e.g., nutrition education) when feeding children with avid eating behaviour more effectively. However, research is yet to examine the momentary predictors of these adaptive feeding practices.
This EMA study aimed to examine parental mood, goals, and context as momentary predictors of parents' use of noncoercive feeding practices during daily feeding interactions with preschool children (3-5-years-old) with an avid eating profile. Parents (N = 109; females n = 85) completed a 10-day EMA period which assessed momentary mood, feeding goals, feeding practices, and contextual factors.
Parents were more likely to use structure-based feeding practices when feeding goals were health-related, the atmosphere was positive or neutral, or when parents initiated eating occasions. Parents were also more likely to use autonomy support feeding practices when their feeding goals were health-related or when parents initiated eating occasions. Encouraging children to eat or negotiating with children about how much or what food to eat was significantly associated with a negative atmosphere during eating occasions.
Together, our findings show that parental mood, feeding goals and context are momentary predictors of parents' use of noncoercive feeding practices to manage children's avid eating behaviour. Further work is needed to examine whether supporting parents to prioritise health-related goals at mealtimes increases the use of adaptive, noncoercive feeding practices.
过度进食是一种增加儿童肥胖风险的饮食模式,对家长来说管理起来颇具挑战。我们之前使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)发现,父母的情绪、喂养目标和饮食环境决定了他们使用强制和纵容喂养方式的情况。家长们还报告说,在更有效地喂养有过度进食行为的孩子时,他们会使用特定的非强制方式,这些方式提供了规则(如示范)或自主支持(如营养教育)。然而,尚未有研究考察这些适应性喂养方式的瞬时预测因素。
这项EMA研究旨在考察父母的情绪、目标和环境,作为与有过度进食模式的学龄前儿童(3至5岁)日常喂养互动中父母使用非强制喂养方式的瞬时预测因素。父母(N = 109;女性n = 85)完成了为期10天的EMA阶段,该阶段评估了瞬时情绪、喂养目标、喂养方式和环境因素。
当喂养目标与健康相关、氛围积极或中性,或者父母发起进食场合时,父母更有可能使用基于规则的喂养方式。当喂养目标与健康相关或父母发起进食场合时,父母也更有可能使用自主支持喂养方式。鼓励孩子进食或与孩子就吃多少或吃什么食物进行协商,与进食场合中的负面氛围显著相关。
我们的研究结果共同表明,父母的情绪、喂养目标和环境是父母使用非强制喂养方式来管理孩子过度进食行为的瞬时预测因素。需要进一步研究,以考察在进餐时支持父母优先考虑与健康相关的目标,是否会增加适应性非强制喂养方式的使用。