Balit Corrine R, LaRosa Jessica M, Ong Jacqueline S M, Kudchadkar Sapna R
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2814-2824. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-328.
Comfort of the critically unwell pediatric patient is paramount to ensuring good outcomes. Analgesia-based, multimodal sedative approaches are the foundation for comfort, whereby pain is addressed first and then sedation titrated to a predefined target based on the goals of care. Given the heterogeneity of patients within the pediatric critical care population, the approach must be individualized based on the age and developmental stage of the child, physiologic status, and degree of invasive treatment required. In both the adult and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), sedation titration is practiced as standard of care to meet therapeutic goals with a focus on facilitating early rehabilitation and extubation while avoiding under- and over-sedation. Sedation protocols have been developed as methods to reduce variability and optimize goal-directed therapy. Components of a sedation protocol include routine analgesia and sedation scoring with validated tools at specified intervals and a predefined algorithm that allows the titration of analgesia and sedation based on those assessments. Sedation protocols are designed to improve communication and documentation of sedation goals while also empowering the bedside team to respond rapidly to changes in a patient's clinical status. Previously it was thought that sedation protocols would consistently reduce duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and length of stay (LOS) for patients in the PICU, however, this has not been the case. Nonetheless, introduction of sedation protocols has provided several benefits, including: (I) reduction in benzodiazepine usage; (II) improvements in interprofessional communication surrounding sedation goals and management of sedation goals; and (III) reductions in iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms. Successful implementation of sedation protocols requires passionate clinical champions and a robust implementation, education, and sustainability plan. Emerging evidence suggests that sedation protocols as part of a bundle of quality improvement initiatives will form the basis of future studies to improve short- and long-term outcomes after PICU discharge. In this review, we aim to define sedation protocols in the context of pediatric critical care and highlight important considerations for clinical practice and research.
对于病情危急的儿科患者而言,确保良好预后的关键在于给予其舒适的体验。基于镇痛的多模式镇静方法是实现舒适的基础,即首先处理疼痛问题,然后根据护理目标将镇静水平滴定至预先设定的目标。鉴于儿科重症监护人群中患者的异质性,该方法必须根据儿童的年龄和发育阶段、生理状态以及所需的侵入性治疗程度进行个体化调整。在成人和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中,镇静滴定已成为标准治疗手段,旨在实现治疗目标,重点是促进早期康复和拔管,同时避免镇静不足和过度镇静。镇静方案已被开发出来,作为减少变异性和优化目标导向治疗的方法。镇静方案的组成部分包括定期使用经过验证的工具进行常规镇痛和镇静评分,以及一个预定义的算法,该算法允许根据这些评估结果滴定镇痛和镇静水平。镇静方案旨在改善镇静目标的沟通和记录,同时使床边团队能够迅速应对患者临床状态的变化。以前人们认为镇静方案会持续缩短PICU患者的机械通气(MV)时间和住院时间(LOS),然而实际情况并非如此。尽管如此,引入镇静方案还是带来了一些益处,包括:(I)减少苯二氮䓬类药物的使用;(II)改善围绕镇静目标和镇静目标管理的跨专业沟通;(III)减少医源性戒断症状。成功实施镇静方案需要热情的临床倡导者以及强有力的实施、教育和可持续性计划。新出现的证据表明,作为一系列质量改进举措一部分的镇静方案将成为未来研究的基础,以改善PICU出院后的短期和长期预后。在本综述中,我们旨在界定儿科重症监护背景下的镇静方案,并强调临床实践和研究中的重要注意事项。