Borrelli Davide Fausto, Højgaard Davíð R M A, Storch Eric A, Geller Daniel A, Melin Karin, Thomsen Per Hove, Ivarsson Tord, Weidle Bernhard, Torp Nor Christian, Tonna Matteo, Cervin Matti
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Psychiatry Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Department of Mental Health, AUSL of Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02757-y.
Children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are at increased risk of psychotic disorders; however, the manifestations and clinical implications of psychotic vulnerability among youth with OCD remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we examined the prevalence and clinical correlates of psychotic vulnerability in youth with OCD across two independent samples. Using the Thought Problems Scale of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), we assessed 215 Scandinavian and 125 North American children and adolescents with OCD. Participants with and without psychotic vulnerability were compared in terms of several clinical features, assessed before and after cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). We examined whether psychotic vulnerability predicted outcome of CBT. Psychotic vulnerability was identified in 41.6% of the Scandinavian and 34.4% of the North American sample. In both samples, participants with psychotic vulnerability had poorer psychosocial functioning and more depressive symptoms at baseline. In the Scandinavian sample those with psychotic vulnerability had poorer psychosocial functioning and more severe anxiety symptoms post-treatment. In the Scandinavian sample, psychotic vulnerability was linked to the symmetry/hoarding dimension, while in the North American sample it was linked to the ordering and contamination-cleaning dimensions at baseline, and only to the contamination-cleaning dimension after treatment. Importantly, psychotic vulnerability did not predict CBT outcome in any of the samples. Our findings show that an in-depth second-level assessment of psychosis risk is merited in many cases of youth with OCD and suggest that treatment gains following CBT for pediatric OCD are similar in those with and without psychotic vulnerability.
患有强迫症(OCD)的儿童和青少年患精神障碍的风险增加;然而,强迫症青少年中精神病易感性的表现和临床意义仍知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们在两个独立样本中研究了强迫症青少年中精神病易感性的患病率及其临床相关因素。我们使用儿童行为检查表(CBCL)中的思维问题量表,对215名斯堪的纳维亚和125名北美患有强迫症的儿童和青少年进行了评估。比较了有和没有精神病易感性的参与者在认知行为疗法(CBT)前后评估的几种临床特征。我们研究了精神病易感性是否能预测CBT的结果。在斯堪的纳维亚样本中,41.6%的人被确定有精神病易感性,在北美样本中这一比例为34.4%。在两个样本中,有精神病易感性的参与者在基线时的心理社会功能较差,抑郁症状更多。在斯堪的纳维亚样本中,有精神病易感性的人在治疗后心理社会功能较差,焦虑症状更严重。在斯堪的纳维亚样本中,精神病易感性与对称/囤积维度有关,而在北美样本中,它在基线时与排序和污染-清洁维度有关,治疗后仅与污染-清洁维度有关。重要的是,在任何一个样本中,精神病易感性都不能预测CBT的结果。我们的研究结果表明,在许多患有强迫症的青少年病例中,对精神病风险进行深入的二级评估是值得的,并且表明针对儿童强迫症的CBT治疗后,有和没有精神病易感性的人的治疗效果相似。