• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰老与觅食行为中过度停留时间延长有关。

Ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying in foraging behaviour.

作者信息

Wolpe Noham, Scott Daniel N, Salomon Mordechai L, Nassar Matthew R, Fletcher Paul C, Fernandez-Egea Emilio

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

NPJ Aging. 2025 May 30;11(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41514-025-00240-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41514-025-00240-1
PMID:40447633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12125363/
Abstract

People constantly decide how much time to invest in rewarding activities. Foraging tasks assess this decision-making by measuring when individuals switch between contexts. People typically perform suboptimally in these tasks, largely due to overstaying, but it remains unclear whether this tendency changes with age independently of cognitive abilities and mental health factors. Previous research showing increased sensitivity to the opportunity cost of time in older adults predicts less overstaying, whereas a hypothesised shift towards exploitative behaviour predicts more overstaying. In an online foraging task, 350 young and older adults decided when to switch between contexts with varying reward conditions. We also assessed cognitive performance and self-reported motivation and depression. Participants consistently overstayed, and this behaviour was strongly associated with sensitivity to reward changes. Despite this, older adults selectively overstayed more without increased reward-based adaptation. Our findings show ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying, supporting increased exploitative behaviour in old age.

摘要

人们不断地决定投入多少时间到有回报的活动中。觅食任务通过测量个体在不同情境之间切换的时间来评估这种决策。人们在这些任务中的表现通常不理想,主要是因为停留时间过长,但目前尚不清楚这种倾向是否会随着年龄的增长而独立于认知能力和心理健康因素发生变化。先前的研究表明,老年人对时间机会成本的敏感性增加预示着停留时间会减少,而假设的向剥削行为的转变则预示着停留时间会增加。在一项在线觅食任务中,350名年轻人和老年人决定何时在具有不同奖励条件的情境之间切换。我们还评估了认知表现、自我报告的动机和抑郁情况。参与者持续停留时间过长,这种行为与对奖励变化的敏感性密切相关。尽管如此,老年人在没有增加基于奖励的适应性的情况下,选择性地停留时间更长。我们的研究结果表明,衰老与过度停留的加剧有关,支持了老年期剥削行为增加的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/36a29a98ebc5/41514_2025_240_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/0fe004b3af4f/41514_2025_240_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/9e0eb753002b/41514_2025_240_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/4322cf2516ce/41514_2025_240_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/08e91978df28/41514_2025_240_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/36a29a98ebc5/41514_2025_240_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/0fe004b3af4f/41514_2025_240_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/9e0eb753002b/41514_2025_240_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/4322cf2516ce/41514_2025_240_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/08e91978df28/41514_2025_240_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f6/12125363/36a29a98ebc5/41514_2025_240_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ageing is associated with exaggerated overstaying in foraging behaviour.衰老与觅食行为中过度停留时间延长有关。
NPJ Aging. 2025 May 30;11(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41514-025-00240-1.
2
Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.多巴胺调节觅食过程中的动态决策。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;40(27):5273-5282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 26.
3
Dysfunctional effort-based decision-making underlies apathy in genetic cerebral small vessel disease.基因性脑小血管病患者的努力决策功能障碍导致冷漠。
Brain. 2018 Nov 1;141(11):3193-3210. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy257.
4
Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm.使用基于奖励的自愿任务切换范式评估奖励在任务选择中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):54-64. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0919-x. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
5
Seizing the opportunity: Lifespan differences in the effects of the opportunity cost of time on cognitive control.抓住机会:时间机会成本对认知控制影响的寿命差异。
Cognition. 2021 Nov;216:104863. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104863. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.额叶、纹状体和内侧颞叶对价值的敏感性在决策过程中区分了冒险型与规避风险型老年人。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12498-12509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-16.2016.
7
Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Continuously Signals Decision Variables in a Patch Foraging Task.大鼠扣带前皮质在斑块觅食任务中持续传递决策变量。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 20;42(29):5730-5744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1940-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
8
The effect of Huntington's disease on cognitive and physical motivation.亨廷顿病对认知和身体动机的影响。
Brain. 2024 Jul 5;147(7):2449-2458. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae023.
9
Reduced Sensitivity to Background Reward Underlies Apathy After Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights From an Ecological Foraging Framework.创伤性脑损伤后淡漠的基础是对背景奖励的敏感性降低:来自生态觅食框架的见解。
Neuroscience. 2023 Sep 15;528:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.07.026. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
10
Is the juice worth the squeeze? Learning the marginal value of mental effort over time.付出的努力是否值得?随着时间的推移了解精神努力的边际价值。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2324-2341. doi: 10.1037/xge0001208. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Major depression symptom severity associations with willingness to exert effort and patch foraging strategy.重度抑郁症状严重程度与付出努力的意愿及斑块状觅食策略的关联。
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 2;54(15):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002691.
2
Attention deficits linked with proclivity to explore while foraging.注意力缺陷与觅食时的探索倾向有关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Feb 28;291(2017):20222584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2584. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Effort Foraging Task reveals positive correlation between individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans.
努力觅食任务揭示了人类在认知和体力努力成本上的个体差异之间存在正相关关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 12;120(50):e2221510120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221510120. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Persistence of effort in apathy.冷漠中的坚持努力。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2023 Dec;179(10):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Inattentive responding can induce spurious associations between task behaviour and symptom measures.注意力不集中的反应可能会导致任务行为和症状测量之间产生虚假关联。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Oct;7(10):1667-1681. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01640-7. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Opportunity cost determines free-operant action initiation latency and predicts apathy.机会成本决定自由操作行为启动潜伏期,并可预测冷漠。
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1850-1859. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003469. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Overharvesting in human patch foraging reflects rational structure learning and adaptive planning.人类斑块觅食中的过度捕捞反映了理性的结构学习和适应性规划。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2216524120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216524120. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Quitting while you're ahead: Patch foraging and temporal cognition.及时止损:贴片觅食与时间认知。
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;136(5):467-478. doi: 10.1037/bne0000526. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
9
The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making.冷漠和强迫对序列决策中计划和停止的影响。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 31;20(3):e3001566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Heightened effort discounting is a common feature of both apathy and fatigue.努力程度折扣增强是冷漠和疲劳的共同特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 15;11(1):22283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01287-2.