Groenewald Engelina, Appleton Jasmine, Hallam Brendan, Gonzalez-Prieto Cristian, Yates Susan, Wilson Daniel, Dobbie Gillian, Dobson Rosie, Cullum Sarah
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 30;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01212-6.
Older adults, especially those with dementia, are often excluded from health research due to physical and medical comorbidities, and the assumption that those with cognitive impairment won't be able to consent. Using routinely collected data for research purposes is a way to include older people in research, and therefore the benefits of research. However, very little research has been done to examine the attitudes of older people towards sharing their routinely collected health data for research purposes.
Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with older health service users in the Counties Manukau health district of Auckland, New Zealand. The interviews explored participants' views around the use of de-identified health data for health service improvement and health services research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Themes identified were: 1) Benefits: participants believed that there were benefits to sharing their health data such as helping others, improving health services, advancing scientific knowledge, and giving back to the health system; sharing health data was also seen as a reflection of good character, and people felt that their pre-existing views about whether they wished to share health data should be respected even if they were no longer able to consent. 2) Concerns: participants had concerns about sharing data with private companies, the use of inaccurate data, and the potential personal and societal consequences of sharing health data. 3) Expectations: participants encouraged collaboration between institutions in New Zealand, but expected data privacy to be maintained, processes to be transparent and cultural values around data to be respected; there was an expectation those sharing health data (patients or institutions) should benefit from any private sector gains.
Older people in our study were supportive of sharing their deidentified health data for research purposes provided that the research would benefit others, now and in the future. This provides more confidence in the use routinely collected health data of older people for research, provided that researchers handle data in a respectful way and use it to benefit communities while avoiding potential harms.
NA.
老年人,尤其是患有痴呆症的老年人,由于身体和医疗合并症,以及认为认知障碍者无法给予知情同意的假设,常常被排除在健康研究之外。将常规收集的数据用于研究目的是让老年人参与研究从而获得研究益处的一种方式。然而,很少有研究去调查老年人对于为研究目的而分享其常规收集的健康数据的态度。
对新西兰奥克兰马努考郡健康区的老年健康服务使用者进行了28次半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了参与者对于使用去识别化健康数据以改善健康服务和进行健康服务研究的看法。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
确定的主题有:1)益处:参与者认为分享他们的健康数据有诸多益处,比如帮助他人、改善健康服务、推进科学知识以及回馈健康系统;分享健康数据也被视为良好品德的体现,并且人们觉得即便他们不再能够给予知情同意,他们先前关于是否希望分享健康数据的观点也应得到尊重。2)担忧:参与者担心与私人公司分享数据、数据不准确的使用情况以及分享健康数据可能带来的个人和社会后果。3)期望:参与者鼓励新西兰各机构之间开展合作,但期望保持数据隐私、流程透明并尊重围绕数据的文化价值观;期望那些分享健康数据的人(患者或机构)能从任何私营部门的收益中获益。
我们研究中的老年人支持为研究目的而分享他们的去识别化健康数据,前提是该研究现在及未来能使他人受益。这为将老年人的常规收集健康数据用于研究提供了更多信心,前提是研究人员以尊重态度处理数据并利用其造福社区同时避免潜在危害。
无。