Rödlund Andreas, Toropova Anna, Lengnick-Hall Rebecca, Powell Byron J, Elinder Liselotte Schäfer, Björklund Christina, Kwak Lydia
Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for worker health, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Implement Sci. 2025 May 30;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01437-4.
Occupational guidelines exist to support workplaces with the prevention of mental health problems (MHP) among their staff. However, knowledge of effective implementation strategies to support their implementation is limited. This study experimentally tested whether a multifaceted implementation strategy - comprising an educational meeting, five workshops, implementation teams, small cyclical tests of change, and facilitation - improves fidelity to a guideline for preventing MHP in a school setting through the pathway of change of the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior (COM-B)-model. To gain a more granular understanding of the mechanisms of change, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to specify mediators related to capability, opportunity, and motivation. This study tested whether the multifaceted strategy versus a discrete strategy (1) improves fidelity, (2) enhances capability, opportunity, and motivation over time, and (3) if the strategy's effect on fidelity is mediated by capability, opportunity, and motivation.
Fifty-five schools were randomly assigned to a multifaceted strategy or a discrete strategy. Fidelity was measured by questionnaires at baseline and 12 months, while capability, opportunity, and motivation were assessed three times within this period (directly after the educational meeting and at three and nine months). The Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire was used to assess TDF hypothesized mediators corresponding to the COM-B components. Separate pathways were analyzed for each mediator. Linear Mixed Modeling was employed to test the strategy's effect on fidelity, and mediation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS Macro.
The multifaceted strategy led to improved fidelity at 12 months (B = 2.81, p < .001). Multifaceted schools reported higher scores for all mediators after nine months compared to schools receiving the discrete strategy. The effect of the multifaceted strategy on fidelity was partially mediated by all TDF mediators (p = < .05) except for beliefs about consequences. Capability-related mediators, including skills (Proportion-mediated = 41%, p = < .01) and behavioral regulation (Proportion-mediated = 35%, p = < .001), accounted for the largest proportion of the effect, followed by the motivation-related mediator goals (Proportion-mediated = 34%, p = < .01).
The multifaceted strategy improved guideline fidelity by enhancing capability, opportunity, and motivation confirming the proposed function of COM-B. This study addresses calls for experimental evidence on how multifaceted implementation strategies achieve implementation outcomes.
ClinicalTrials.org dr.nr 2020-01214.
职业指南旨在支持工作场所预防员工心理健康问题(MHP)。然而,关于支持其实施的有效实施策略的知识有限。本研究通过能力 - 机会 - 动机 - 行为(COM - B)模型的变革途径,对一种多方面实施策略——包括一次教育会议、五个工作坊、实施团队、小规模循环变革测试和促进措施——是否能提高学校环境中预防MHP指南的依从性进行了实验测试。为了更深入地了解变革机制,使用了理论领域框架(TDF)来确定与能力、机会和动机相关的中介因素。本研究测试了多方面策略与单一策略相比是否(1)提高依从性,(2)随着时间推移增强能力、机会和动机,以及(3)该策略对依从性的影响是否由能力、机会和动机介导。
55所学校被随机分配到多方面策略组或单一策略组。在基线和12个月时通过问卷调查测量依从性,在此期间对能力、机会和动机进行三次评估(教育会议后立即评估以及在三个月和九个月时评估)。使用实施行为决定因素问卷来评估与COM - B组件相对应的TDF假设中介因素。对每个中介因素分析单独的途径。采用线性混合模型测试该策略对依从性的影响,并使用PROCESS宏进行中介分析。
多方面策略在12个月时导致依从性提高(B = 2.81,p <.001)。与接受单一策略的学校相比,采用多方面策略的学校在九个月后所有中介因素的得分更高。除了对后果的信念外,多方面策略对依从性的影响部分由所有TDF中介因素介导(p = <.05)。与能力相关的中介因素,包括技能(中介比例 = 41%,p = <.01)和行为调节(中介比例 = 35%,p = <.001),在影响中占最大比例,其次是与动机相关的中介因素目标(中介比例 = 34%,p = <.01)。
多方面策略通过增强能力、机会和动机提高了指南依从性,证实了COM - B的预期功能。本研究回应了关于多方面实施策略如何实现实施成果的实验证据的呼吁。
ClinicalTrials.org 编号2020 - 01214。