Smith Jeffrey L, Ritchie Mona J, Kim Bo, Miller Christopher J, Chinman Matthew J, Kelly P Adam, Landes Sara J, Kirchner JoAnn E
VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) & HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research (CeMHOR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 900 S. Shackelford Road, Fifth Floor, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, #755, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024 Apr 18;2024. doi: 10.1007/s43477-024-00119-5.
Transferring successful implementation strategies from research to practice requires approaches for assessing fidelity to the strategy's core components. Implementation facilitation (IF) is a strategy involving an interactive process of problem-solving, enabling, and supporting individuals in efforts to implement clinical innovations that occurs in the context of a recognized need for improvement and supportive interpersonal relationships. Because IF is a dynamic strategy involving numerous activities, our objective was to conduct a rigorous consensus development process to identify core activities for monitoring fidelity to IF when applied in clinical settings. We first conducted a scoping literature review to identify the range of activities used when IF has been applied in clinical settings, searching multiple citation databases for English-language articles including "facilitation" or other commonly-used terms for the strategy published from 1996-2015. Through multi-stage screening, 135 articles (from 94 studies) were identified for data extraction on IF activities, frequency with which IF activities were identified as 'core' by study authors, and study outcomes. From the literature review, we identified 32 distinct IF activities and developed definitions/examples for each. Next, we conducted a 3-stage, modified-Delphi expert panel consensus development process to identify core IF activities across three implementation phases (i.e., Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment). The expert panel identified 8 core activities for the Pre-Implementation Phase, 8 core activities for the Implementation Phase, and 4 core activities for the Sustainment Phase. This work provides an important foundation for developing measures/tools to assess use of core IF activities to ensure the strategy is delivered with fidelity.
将成功的实施策略从研究转化为实践需要评估对策略核心组成部分的忠诚度的方法。实施促进(IF)是一种策略,涉及一个解决问题、赋能和支持个人努力实施临床创新的互动过程,这种互动过程发生在公认的需要改进的背景以及支持性的人际关系之中。由于IF是一种涉及众多活动的动态策略,我们的目标是开展一个严格的共识达成过程,以确定在临床环境中应用IF时监测其忠诚度的核心活动。我们首先进行了一项范围界定文献综述,以确定在临床环境中应用IF时所使用的活动范围,在多个引文数据库中搜索1996年至2015年发表的包含“促进”或该策略其他常用术语的英文文章。通过多阶段筛选,确定了135篇文章(来自94项研究)用于提取有关IF活动、研究作者将IF活动确定为“核心”的频率以及研究结果的数据。从文献综述中,我们确定了32种不同的IF活动,并为每种活动制定了定义/示例。接下来,我们进行了一个三阶段的、经过修改的德尔菲专家小组共识达成过程,以确定三个实施阶段(即实施前、实施、维持)的核心IF活动。专家小组确定了实施前阶段的8项核心活动、实施阶段的8项核心活动和维持阶段的4项核心活动。这项工作为开发评估核心IF活动使用情况的措施/工具提供了重要基础,以确保该策略能够忠实地实施。