• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陆氏牵开器在单侧双孔通道内镜下椎间盘切除术中的应用价值及使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。

The usefulness and utilisation of Lu's retractor for unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Zhang Qing-Zhou, Zhang Da-Wei, Wen Hui-Lan, Chen Tao, Chen Jun-Quan, Lu Hai

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.

Department of Operation Room and Anesthesiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 30;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05932-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05932-8
PMID:40448202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12123837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel endoscopic instrument, Lu's retractor, was developed to address the recurrent issue of limited visualisation during unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spinal surgery. Engineered to optimize the surgical field by mitigating soft tissue interference, this device aims to enhance operative precision and efficiency.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 90 consecutive patients who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy via the UBE technique between June 2023 and June 2024. Based on the type of retractor utilised, patients were categorized into three groups: traditional retractor-assisted UBE discectomy (T-UBE), metal retractor-assisted UBE discectomy (M-UBE), and Lu's retractor-assisted UBE discectomy (Lu-UBE). Perioperative parameters-including operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and complication incidence-along with clinical outcomes, were systematically recorded and compared to assess the relative efficacy of each retractor.

RESULTS

The Lu-UBE group exhibited significantly reduced hospital stays and intraoperative haemorrhage compared to the T-UBE and M-UBE cohorts. Furthermore, this group reported lower numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for both lumbar and radicular pain, alongside decreased Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Final follow-up assessments indicated superior Macnab grades, denoting improved functional recovery, and a lower incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Lu's retractor offers notable advantages over conventional and metal retractors in lumbar UBE discectomy by enhancing intraoperative visualization and minimizing complications. These findings support its potential utility as an effective alternative in minimally invasive spinal procedures.

摘要

背景

一种新型的内镜器械——鲁氏牵开器,被研发出来以解决单侧双通道内镜(UBE)脊柱手术中反复出现的视野受限问题。该器械旨在通过减少软组织干扰来优化手术视野,以提高手术精度和效率。

方法

这项单中心回顾性队列研究分析了2023年6月至2024年6月期间连续90例行单节段腰椎间盘切除术的UBE技术患者。根据所使用的牵开器类型,患者被分为三组:传统牵开器辅助UBE椎间盘切除术(T-UBE)、金属牵开器辅助UBE椎间盘切除术(M-UBE)和鲁氏牵开器辅助UBE椎间盘切除术(Lu-UBE)。系统记录围手术期参数,包括手术时间、术中出血量和并发症发生率,以及临床结果,以评估每种牵开器的相对疗效。

结果

与T-UBE组和M-UBE组相比,Lu-UBE组住院时间和术中出血量显著减少。此外,该组腰椎和神经根性疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)得分较低,同时Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)得分也有所下降。最终随访评估显示Macnab分级更高,表明功能恢复更好,术后并发症发生率更低。

结论

在腰椎UBE椎间盘切除术中,鲁氏牵开器在增强术中视野和减少并发症方面比传统牵开器和金属牵开器具有显著优势。这些发现支持了其作为微创脊柱手术有效替代方案的潜在效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/78370eff5db8/13018_2025_5932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/1690e9c4999f/13018_2025_5932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/30ee28822f9c/13018_2025_5932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/5c6195a3a57c/13018_2025_5932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/78370eff5db8/13018_2025_5932_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/1690e9c4999f/13018_2025_5932_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/30ee28822f9c/13018_2025_5932_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/5c6195a3a57c/13018_2025_5932_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/12123837/78370eff5db8/13018_2025_5932_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The usefulness and utilisation of Lu's retractor for unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study.陆氏牵开器在单侧双孔通道内镜下椎间盘切除术中的应用价值及使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 30;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05932-8.
2
Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) compared with conventional open lumbar discectomy with 3D microscope (OLDM) assisted.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术(UBE)与3D显微镜辅助下传统开放式腰椎间盘切除术(OLDM)的临床疗效比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41440. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041440.
3
Comparative study of the learning curves for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopy techniques.经皮内镜下腰椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术与单侧双通道内镜技术学习曲线的比较研究
BMC Surg. 2025 May 15;25(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02951-4.
4
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
5
Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study.辅助牵引技术在单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Aug;51(8):3000605231164006. doi: 10.1177/03000605231164006.
6
Comparative analysis of endoscopic discectomy for demanding lumbar disc herniation.复杂腰椎间盘突出症的内镜下椎间盘切除术的对比分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91964-3.
7
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy in the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH): a retrospective study.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)与单侧双通道内镜(UBE)椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症(FLLDH)的比较:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 24;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05906-w.
8
Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Degenerative Disease.单侧双通道内镜与经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床与影像学比较
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1105-1113. doi: 10.1111/os.14361. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
9
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Linked with Posterior Ring Apophysis Separation: A Retrospective Study.单侧双孔通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴后环骨突分离的腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:957-963. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.102. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
10
Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间盘取出术与经皮内镜椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的手术侵袭性和隐性失血比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 21;19(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05274-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Analysis of UBE-Related Complications: Prevention and Management Strategies from 4685 Patients.UBE 相关并发症的全面分析:4685 例患者的预防和管理策略。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 10;30:e944018. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944018.
2
Treatment Gaps and Emerging Therapies in Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗差距和新兴疗法。
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):401-413.
3
Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in China: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
单侧双通道内镜与显微镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗中国退变性腰椎管狭窄症的前瞻性随机对照非劣效临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e083786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083786.
4
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy via translaminar approach for highly upward-migrated lumbar disc herniation: a technical note and preliminary treatment outcomes.经皮侧方入路双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗高位极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症:技术要点及初步疗效观察
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 7;25(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07819-x.
5
Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.前瞻性对比分析三种减压手术治疗腰椎中央狭窄症:传统、全内镜和双通道内镜椎板切除术。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3.
6
Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion for unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.单侧双通道内镜减压术与前路颈椎减压融合术治疗单侧神经根型颈椎病或伴发颈椎病:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 25;25(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07697-3.
7
Paravertebrally-Injected Multifunctional Hydrogel for Sustained Anti-Inflammation and Pain Relief in Lumbar Disc Herniation.经椎间孔注射多功能水凝胶治疗腰椎间盘突出症的抗炎和止痛作用。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2024 Oct;13(27):e2401227. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401227. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2139-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08116-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Understanding the etiopathogenesis of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: From clinical evidence to basic scientific research.了解腰椎间盘突出症的发病机制:从临床证据到基础科学研究。
JOR Spine. 2023 Oct 18;7(1):e1289. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1289. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Anterior transcorporeal approach combined with posterior translaminar approach in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for two-segment cervical disc herniation treatment: a technical report and early follow-up.经皮内镜颈椎间盘切除术治疗两节段颈椎间盘突出症的前路经椎体入路联合后路经关节突入路:技术报告和早期随访。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04471-4.