Cheng Zijing, Lee Hochang B, Maeng Daniel D, Hill Elaine L, Li Yue
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health Policy and Outcomes Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Aug;26(8):105691. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105691. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
This study aimed to examine the potential impact of Medicaid total long-term services and supports (LTSS) expenditures and the proportion allocated to home- and community-based services (HCBS) on unmet needs among community-dwelling older adults with dementia.
This is a retrospective study using nationally representative, longitudinal data and quasi-experimental approach.
A total of 2722 respondent-waves of community-dwelling older adults who participated in at least 1 of the 7 waves of Health and Retirement Study interviews between 2008 and 2020 and were identified as having dementia.
Unmet needs were assessed using a binary variable indicating whether respondents who reported difficulties with activities of daily living (ADL) did not receive the necessary assistance. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with a logit link function and binomial distribution, clustered at the individual level, were used for both bivariate and multivariable analyses. To address potential endogeneity, a 2-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) analysis was conducted using state education expenditures per pupil as an instrumental variable (IV). Additionally, the Durbin-Wu-Hausman (DWH) test was performed to assess endogeneity.
Both GLM and IV regressions indicated that an increase in the share of HCBS relative to total Medicaid LTSS expenditures was associated with a significant reduction in unmet ADL needs among dementia individuals (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-0.98, P = 0.03; OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-1.00, P = 0.05). However, total Medicaid LTSS expenditures showed no significant association with patient unmet needs in either model. The DWH test for endogeneity supported the GLM estimates, confirming that total Medicaid LTSS expenditure was exogenous (P = .64). Sensitivity analyses excluding the total Medicaid LTSS expenditures yielded consistent estimates and suggested no collinearity between the independent variables.
A higher proportion of Medicaid LTSS expenditures allocated to HCBS can potentially reduce unmet needs for ADL among community-dwelling older adults with dementia, supporting efforts to shift long-term care from institutional to home- and community-based settings.
本研究旨在探讨医疗补助长期服务与支持(LTSS)总支出以及分配给居家和社区服务(HCBS)的比例对社区居住的老年痴呆症患者未满足需求的潜在影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,采用具有全国代表性的纵向数据和准实验方法。
共有2722名社区居住的老年受访者参与了2008年至2020年期间七轮健康与退休研究访谈中的至少一轮,并被确定患有痴呆症。
使用一个二元变量评估未满足的需求,该变量表明报告在日常生活活动(ADL)方面有困难的受访者是否未获得必要的帮助。在个体层面进行聚类,采用具有logit链接函数和二项分布的广义线性模型(GLM)进行双变量和多变量分析。为解决潜在的内生性问题,使用人均州教育支出作为工具变量(IV)进行两阶段残差纳入(2SRI)分析。此外,进行了杜宾-吴-豪斯曼(DWH)检验以评估内生性。
GLM和IV回归均表明,相对于医疗补助LTSS总支出,HCBS份额的增加与痴呆症患者未满足的ADL需求显著减少相关(OR = 0.77,95% CI 0.59 - 0.98,P = 0.03;OR = 0.76,95% CI 0.58 - 1.00,P = 0.05)。然而,在两个模型中,医疗补助LTSS总支出与患者未满足的需求均无显著关联。内生性的DWH检验支持了GLM估计,证实医疗补助LTSS总支出是外生的(P = 0.64)。排除医疗补助LTSS总支出的敏感性分析得出了一致的估计结果,并表明自变量之间不存在共线性。
分配给HCBS的医疗补助LTSS支出比例较高可能会减少社区居住的老年痴呆症患者未满足的ADL需求,支持将长期护理从机构转向居家和社区环境的努力。