• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者及幸存者中的经济毒性:英国与美国的比较研究

Financial toxicity amongst cancer patients and survivors: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and United States.

作者信息

Ngan Tran Thu, Tonorezos Emily, Donnelly Michael, O'Neill Ciaran

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 31;33(6):521. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09568-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09568-6
PMID:40450106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12126310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study investigated the experiences of financial toxicity (FT) amongst cancer patients/survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (USA/US).

METHODS

Six hundred cancer patients/survivors residing in the UK (n = 319) or USA/US (n = 281) completed an online cross-sectional survey using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)-a validated measure of FT. Severity of FT was defined as 'no' (COST scores ≥ 26), 'mild' (14-25), and 'moderate/severe' (0-13).

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of UK participants faced FT which was significantly lower compared to the USA/US at 55% (crude OR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.73-3.42). An ordered logistic regression model showed that in the USA/US, being 65 + years old (adjusted OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.48), retired (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.75), and having a higher household income (aOR ranged 0.03-0.19) decreased the risk of FT, whilst being female increased the risk (aOR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.01-3.32). In the UK, age and sex did not have an effect, but higher income and being retired showed an identical pattern compared to the US.

CONCLUSIONS

FT was less prevalent and less severe in the UK, compared to the USA/US. The high prevalence of FT underscores the need to provide an additional level of protection to the most vulnerable groups than is currently offered in either country.

摘要

背景

该研究调查了英国(UK)和美国(USA/US)癌症患者/幸存者的经济毒性(FT)经历。

方法

600名居住在英国(n = 319)或美国(n = 281)的癌症患者/幸存者完成了一项在线横断面调查,使用经济毒性综合评分(COST)——一种经过验证的FT测量方法。FT的严重程度定义为“无”(COST评分≥26)、“轻度”(14 - 25)和“中度/重度”(0 - 13)。

结果

34%的英国参与者面临FT,这一比例显著低于美国的55%(粗比值比[OR] = 2.44,95%置信区间[CI] 1.73 - 3.42)。有序逻辑回归模型显示,在美国/美国,65岁及以上(调整后OR = 0.19,95% CI 0.07 - 0.48)、退休(调整后OR = 0.26,95% CI 0.09 - 0.75)以及家庭收入较高(调整后OR范围为0.03 - 0.19)会降低FT风险,而女性会增加风险(调整后OR = 1.83,95% CI 1.01 - 3.32)。在英国,年龄和性别没有影响,但与美国相比较高收入和退休呈现相同模式。

结论

与美国相比,FT在英国的患病率较低且严重程度较轻。FT的高患病率凸显了需要为最脆弱群体提供比两国目前所提供的更高水平保护的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cc/12126310/2acca5f2fa2e/520_2025_9568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cc/12126310/2acca5f2fa2e/520_2025_9568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cc/12126310/2acca5f2fa2e/520_2025_9568_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Financial toxicity amongst cancer patients and survivors: a comparative study of the United Kingdom and United States.癌症患者及幸存者中的经济毒性:英国与美国的比较研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 31;33(6):521. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09568-6.
2
Impact of Financial Toxicity on the Health-Related Quality of Life and Financial Well-Being of Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and United States.财务毒性对癌症患者及幸存者健康相关生活质量和财务状况的影响:英国与美国的比较研究
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(2):e70606. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70606.
3
Assessing the Relationship between Socio-demographic, Clinical Profile and Financial Toxicity: Evidence from Cancer Survivors in Sarawak.评估社会人口统计学、临床特征与经济毒性之间的关系:来自砂拉越癌症幸存者的证据。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):3077-3083. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.3077.
4
Patient-reported financial toxicity, quality of life, and health behaviors in insured US cancer survivors.美国癌症幸存者的报告患者财务毒性、生活质量和健康行为。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):349-358. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05468-z. Epub 2020 May 3.
5
Understanding financial toxicity in head and neck cancer survivors.了解头颈部癌症幸存者的财务毒性。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Aug;95:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.023. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Do discussions of financial burdens decrease long-term financial toxicity in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors?讨论经济负担是否会降低青少年和年轻成年癌症幸存者的长期财务毒性?
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 3;31(7):434. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07822-3.
7
Financial hardship, financial toxicity, and transportation challenges among older cancer survivors treated with curative-intent surgery.接受根治性手术治疗的老年癌症幸存者面临的经济困难、经济毒性和交通挑战。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;33(4):339. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09393-x.
8
Financial toxicity is more than costs of care: the relationship between employment and financial toxicity in long-term cancer survivors.财务毒性不仅仅是医疗费用:长期癌症幸存者的就业与财务毒性之间的关系。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):10-20. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0723-7. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
Financial burden of cancer care under the Affordable Care Act: Analysis of MEPS-Experiences with Cancer Survivorship 2011 and 2016.平价医疗法案下癌症护理的经济负担:对 2011 年和 2016 年癌症生存者经历医疗保险补充调查的分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):523-536. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00772-y. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial toxicity among cancer patients, survivors and their families in the United Kingdom: a scoping review.英国癌症患者、幸存者及其家属的财务毒性:范围综述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):e702-e713. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad143.
2
Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported financial toxicity in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analyses.癌症幸存者中自我报告的财务毒性的流行率和风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(4):457-474. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2142877. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
[ORATOR2 trial: randomized comparison of primary surgery vs. primary radiotherapy for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in the context of de-escalated therapy].
[ORATOR2试验:在降阶梯治疗背景下,HPV相关口咽癌的原发手术与原发放疗的随机对照研究]
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Nov;198(11):1045-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01987-2. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Financial toxicity in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in Germany-a cross-sectional study.德国接受放射治疗的癌症患者的财务毒性:一项横断面研究。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Dec;198(12):1053-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01936-z. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
The Relationship between Cancer Caregiver Burden and Psychological Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Social Connectedness.癌症照顾者负担与心理结局的关系:社会联结的调节作用。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 22;29(1):14-26. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29010002.
6
Neuroticism, cancer mortality salience, and physician avoidance in cancer survivors: Proximity of treatment matters.神经质、癌症死亡突显与癌症幸存者的医生回避:治疗的接近程度很重要。
Psychooncology. 2022 Apr;31(4):641-648. doi: 10.1002/pon.5850. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
7
Emerging Understanding About the Impact of Financial Toxicity Related to Cancer: Canadian Perspectives.关于癌症相关经济毒性影响的新认识:加拿大视角。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Aug;37(4):151174. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151174. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
Financial toxicity due to breast cancer treatment in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from Vietnam.低收入和中等收入国家乳腺癌治疗所致的财务毒性:来自越南的证据。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6325-6333. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06210-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Evaluating meaningful levels of financial toxicity in gynecologic cancers.评估妇科癌症中的有意义的财务毒性水平。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jun;31(6):801-806. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002475. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review.癌症幸存者的财务毒性和就业状况。系统文献综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):5693-5708. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05719-z. Epub 2020 Aug 31.