Baron Elise, Pratt Amy, Donahoe-Fillmore Betsy
Augment Therapy®, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Montgomery County ESC, Dayton, OH, USA.
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2499022. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2499022. Epub 2025 May 31.
To determine the feasibility of using an immersive augmented-reality technology (AT) in conjunction with physical therapy (PT) for in-school therapy, while determining whether this technology would be as engaging and motivating as standard PT.
Participants included Fifteen students (6-8 y/o) receiving once-weekly PT. The therapist was instructed to engage students in AT and standard PT for one academic year, alternating sessions. Before each session, students were informed of therapy modality and rated their excitement using a Smiley Face Likert scale with associated text. To assess feasibility, the number and order of each session type, as well as student refusal rate, were investigated. To assess engagement, the therapist recorded time-on-task and number of times redirection was needed. Feasibility was reported as descriptive statistics, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare average scores on excitement and engagement between AT and standard PT.
60% of students (9/15) reaching the intended goal of 50% of therapy sessions as AT, as well as 60% (9/15) of students 'roughly alternating' (no more than three same session types in a row) their sessions throughout the duration of the study. The student refusal rate of AT was 0%. When using AT, students were 23% (= <.0001) more excited, 4.4% (=.004) more on task and needed 61% (= <.0001) less refocusing compared to standard PT.
Integrating AT alongside standard PT proved to be moderately feasible in a school setting. Additionally, students demonstrated increased excitement, increased time on tasks and decreased refocusing during a session using AT. A flexible-use approach will make AT a motivating addition to school-based therapy.
确定将沉浸式增强现实技术(AT)与物理治疗(PT)结合用于校内治疗的可行性,同时确定该技术是否会与标准PT一样具有吸引力和激励作用。
参与者包括15名接受每周一次PT治疗的学生(6 - 8岁)。治疗师被要求让学生在一学年内交替进行AT治疗和标准PT治疗。在每次治疗前,告知学生治疗方式,并使用带有相关文字的笑脸李克特量表对他们的兴奋程度进行评分。为评估可行性,调查了每种治疗类型的次数和顺序以及学生拒绝率。为评估参与度,治疗师记录了任务执行时间和需要重新引导的次数。可行性以描述性统计报告,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较AT治疗和标准PT治疗在兴奋度和参与度方面的平均得分。
60%的学生(9/15)达到了将50%的治疗课程作为AT治疗的预期目标,并且60%(9/15)的学生在整个研究期间“大致交替”(连续不超过三种相同的治疗类型)他们的治疗课程。AT治疗的学生拒绝率为0%。与标准PT治疗相比,使用AT治疗时,学生的兴奋度提高了23%(= <.0001),任务执行时间增加了4.4%(=.004),重新集中注意力的需求减少了61%(= <.0001)。
在学校环境中,将AT与标准PT相结合被证明具有一定的可行性。此外,学生在使用AT治疗的过程中表现出更高的兴奋度、更长的任务执行时间以及更少的重新集中注意力的情况。灵活使用的方法将使AT成为学校治疗中一种具有激励作用的补充方式。