Cheng Hongtao, Shao Lu, Wu Huijun, Mi Boya, Li Qiugui, Zhang June
School of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine Intensive Care Unit, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70078.
Sepsis is a critical global health issue, particularly affecting older adults. Despite advances in acute sepsis management, the long-term outcomes for survivors, particularly those transitioning to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), remain poorly characterized.
To evaluate the prognostic value of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) in predicting 6-month mortality among older adult sepsis survivors discharged to SNFs.
An observational cohort study of older adult sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary academic medical centre in Boston from 2008 to 2019 was performed. Patients were stratified into low (≤ 5), intermediate (6, 7) and high (≥ 8) ACCI score groups. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, we determined the association between ACCI scores and 6-month mortality, calculating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The predictive performance was assessed using ROC curve analysis and compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.
The study included 3713 sepsis survivors aged 65 and older discharged to SNFs. The median age was around 80 years, and 52.6% of the participants were female. The analysis revealed that each one-point increase in the ACCI was associated with an 18% higher risk of mortality within 6 months (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.14-1.22; p < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with individuals with low ACCI scores, those in the moderate ACCI score group had a HR of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.26-1.91, p < 0.001), and those in the high ACCI score group had a HR of 2.43 (95% CI: 1.96-3.03, p < 0.001). ACCI demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with SOFA scores (area under the curve [AUC] 0.65 vs. 0.53, p < 0.001).
ACCI serves as an independent predictor of 6-month mortality in older adult sepsis survivors discharged to SNFs.
Critical care nurses can use ACCI as a risk stratification tool to identify high-risk older sepsis survivors, inform discharge planning and improve interprofessional communication for tailored post-acute care interventions in SNFs.
脓毒症是一个严峻的全球健康问题,对老年人影响尤甚。尽管急性脓毒症管理取得了进展,但幸存者的长期预后,尤其是那些转入专业护理机构(SNFs)的患者,仍未得到充分描述。
评估年龄校正的查尔森合并症指数(ACCI)在预测转入SNFs的老年脓毒症幸存者6个月死亡率方面的预后价值。
对2008年至2019年波士顿一家三级学术医疗中心重症监护病房(ICU)的老年脓毒症患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。患者被分为ACCI评分低(≤5)、中(6、7)和高(≥8)三组。使用Cox比例风险模型,我们确定了ACCI评分与6个月死亡率之间的关联,计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。使用ROC曲线分析评估预测性能,并与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分进行比较。
该研究纳入了3713名65岁及以上转入SNFs的脓毒症幸存者。中位年龄约为80岁,52.6%的参与者为女性。分析显示,ACCI每增加1分,6个月内死亡风险就会增加18%(HR 1.18;95% CI 1.14 - 1.22;p < 0.001)。此外,与ACCI评分低的个体相比,ACCI评分中等组的HR为1.55(95% CI:1.26 - 1.91,p < 0.001),ACCI评分高组的HR为2.43(95% CI:1.96 - 3.03,p < 0.001)。与SOFA评分相比,ACCI表现出更好的预测性能(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.65对0.53,p < 0.001)。
ACCI可作为转入SNFs的老年脓毒症幸存者6个月死亡率的独立预测指标。
重症护理护士可将ACCI用作风险分层工具,以识别高危老年脓毒症幸存者,为出院计划提供信息,并改善跨专业沟通,以便在SNFs中进行有针对性的急性后护理干预。