• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与卡尔加里痴呆症及相关生活问题中心(CPCLW)的合作安排如何促进了志愿者社区支持(VCS)团队在艾伯塔省当地社区为痴呆症患者及其护理人员的福祉提供支持的工作。

How the Collaborative Arrangement with CPCLW Facilitated the Efforts of VCS Teams to Support the Wellbeing of Persons Living with Dementia and their Caregivers in their Local Alberta Communities.

作者信息

Tymczak Aleksandra, Lightfoot Helen, Wold Blair

机构信息

Alberta Health Services, CA.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2025 May 27;25(2):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9061. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.9061
PMID:40453329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124260/
Abstract

The work of the 2020-2023 Connecting People & Community for Living Well Health Canada grant initiative focused on determining what contributes to the wellbeing of those living with dementia and their caregivers, across rural Alberta communities, as well as determining what supports the work of the voluntary and community sector (VCS) teams who seek to better support them. These VCS teams included representatives from across local health, social and community sector partners, including local collaboratives. Evaluation findings highlighted the need to support VCS teams to sustain collaborative community-based work and to build and enhance individual and community wellbeing.

摘要

2020年至2023年加拿大卫生部“连接人们与社区,促进健康生活”资助计划的工作重点是,确定在阿尔伯塔省农村社区中,哪些因素有助于痴呆症患者及其护理人员的福祉,同时确定哪些因素能支持志愿和社区部门(VCS)团队开展工作,这些团队旨在更好地为患者及其护理人员提供支持。这些VCS团队包括来自当地卫生、社会和社区部门合作伙伴(包括地方合作组织)的代表。评估结果强调,需要支持VCS团队维持基于社区的协作工作,并增进个人和社区的福祉。

相似文献

1
How the Collaborative Arrangement with CPCLW Facilitated the Efforts of VCS Teams to Support the Wellbeing of Persons Living with Dementia and their Caregivers in their Local Alberta Communities.与卡尔加里痴呆症及相关生活问题中心(CPCLW)的合作安排如何促进了志愿者社区支持(VCS)团队在艾伯塔省当地社区为痴呆症患者及其护理人员的福祉提供支持的工作。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 May 27;25(2):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9061. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Knowledge exchange throughout the dementia care journey by Canadian rural community-based health care practitioners, persons with dementia, and their care partners: an interpretive descriptive study.加拿大农村社区医疗从业者、痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴在痴呆症护理过程中的知识交流:一项诠释性描述性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2012 Oct;12(4):2201. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations.影响全科医疗与志愿及社区部门组织合作的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):e360-e369. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12538. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Evaluation of Dementia Actif, a dementia-friendly exercise and wellbeing programme: mixed-methods study.痴呆症友好型运动与健康计划(Dementia Actif)评估:混合方法研究。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02136-0.
6
Services for older adults in rural primary care memory clinic communities and surrounding areas: a qualitative descriptive study.农村初级保健记忆诊所社区及周边地区老年人服务:定性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11167-w.
7
Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.方案:与社区组织采用共同生产和同伴研究方法,为共同生产与同伴研究中心(CoPPeR)网络制定蓝图。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 2;5:27. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1. eCollection 2025.
8
Outcomes from a collaborative project developing and evaluating a community rehabilitation worker program for Northwestern Ontario First Nations.安大略省西北部第一民族社区康复工作者方案的制定和评估合作项目的成果。
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Jul;23(3):7809. doi: 10.22605/RRH7809. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
10
Context, complexity and cross-pollination: Nursing leaders' views of the role of the voluntary and community sector in nurse education.背景、复杂性与交叉授粉:护理领导者对志愿和社区部门在护士教育中作用的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104732. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review.运用公共卫生逻辑模型评估农村卫生联盟:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):864-878. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015.
2
Beyond the Manuscript: Developing a Productive Workgroup Within a Community Coalition: Transtheoretical Model Processes, Stages of Change, and Lessons Learned.超越手稿:在社区联盟中建立高效工作小组:跨理论模型过程、变革阶段及经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1S):73-79. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0022.
3
How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory.社区环境如何影响形成阶段的联盟?基于社区联盟行动理论的多案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 23;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-90.
4
What explains community coalition effectiveness?: a review of the literature.如何解释社区联盟的有效性?文献综述
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Apr;30(4):351-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004.