Perrin Antoine, Rein Frank, Christe Philippe, Pellet Jérôme
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, UNIL-Sorge, Biophore, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
N+P Wildlife Ecology, Place St-François 6, CH-1003 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Landsc Ecol. 2025;40(6):113. doi: 10.1007/s10980-025-02133-w. Epub 2025 May 30.
Habitat loss is widely recognized as a major threat to biodiversity, but the effects of habitat fragmentation, whether positive or negative, remain controversial. It has been suggested that these effects vary depending on the spatial scale studied (patch vs. landscape) and the biodiversity metric considered (α-, β-, or γ-diversity).
We aimed to test the contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation on insect diversity across different scales. Specifically, we tested whether habitat fragmentation negatively affect α-diversity at the patch scale, while having positive effects on β- and γ-diversity at the landscape scale.
We conducted surveys of Lepidoptera and Orthoptera in 18 dry meadows of varying size and isolation in Switzerland. We assessed the effects of patch size and connectivity on species diversity (α-diversity), analyzed species turnover (β-diversity) between patches, and performed SLOSS analyses to compare cumulative species richness (γ-diversity) between patches.
Patch size and connectivity positively influenced α-diversity for both Lepidoptera and Orthoptera. However, at the landscape scale, multiple small patches supported equal or even higher γ-diversity than a single large patch of equivalent area. β-diversity increased with geographical distance between patches, indicating greater species turnover between more distant patches.
Our results highlight that the effects of habitat fragmentation, whether positive or negative, are scale-dependent. While habitat fragmentation negatively affects α-diversity at the patch scale, it can enhance overall β- and γ-diversity at the landscape scale. These findings suggest that conservation strategies should consider both large and small habitat patches to maximize biodiversity.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-025-02133-w.
栖息地丧失被广泛认为是生物多样性面临的主要威胁,但栖息地破碎化的影响,无论其是积极还是消极的,仍然存在争议。有人认为,这些影响因所研究的空间尺度(斑块与景观)以及所考虑的生物多样性指标(α-、β-或γ-多样性)而异。
我们旨在测试栖息地破碎化在不同尺度上对昆虫多样性的不同影响。具体而言,我们测试了栖息地破碎化是否在斑块尺度上对α-多样性产生负面影响,而在景观尺度上对β-和γ-多样性产生积极影响。
我们在瑞士18个大小和隔离程度各异的干草草甸中对鳞翅目和直翅目昆虫进行了调查。我们评估了斑块大小和连通性对物种多样性(α-多样性)的影响,分析了斑块之间的物种周转率(β-多样性),并进行了SLOSS分析以比较斑块之间的累积物种丰富度(γ-多样性)。
斑块大小和连通性对鳞翅目和直翅目的α-多样性均产生了积极影响。然而,在景观尺度上,多个小斑块所支持的γ-多样性与同等面积的单个大斑块相当,甚至更高。β-多样性随着斑块之间地理距离的增加而增加,这表明距离更远的斑块之间物种周转率更高。
我们的结果表明,栖息地破碎化的影响,无论其是积极还是消极的,都取决于尺度。虽然栖息地破碎化在斑块尺度上对α-多样性产生负面影响,但它可以在景观尺度上提高整体β-和γ-多样性。这些发现表明,保护策略应同时考虑大型和小型栖息地斑块,以实现生物多样性的最大化。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10980-025-02133-w获取的补充材料。