Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, 44118, USA.
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.
Ecol Lett. 2020 Apr;23(4):674-681. doi: 10.1111/ele.13471. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related to the amount of habitat around the plot than to patch size or isolation; (2) habitat amount better predicts species density than patch size and isolation combined, (3) there is no effect of habitat fragmentation per se on species density and (4) patch size and isolation effects do not become stronger with declining habitat amount. Data on eight taxonomic groups from 35 studies around the world support these predictions. Conserving species density requires minimising habitat loss, irrespective of the configuration of the patches in which that habitat is contained.
数十年的研究表明,物种丰富度取决于栖息地斑块的空间特征,尤其是它们的大小和隔离度。相比之下,生境量假说预测:(1)在固定大小的样地中(物种密度),物种丰富度与样地周围的生境量的关系比与斑块大小或隔离度的关系更强烈和更呈正相关;(2)生境量比斑块大小和隔离度的综合预测物种密度更好;(3)生境破碎化本身对物种密度没有影响;(4)斑块大小和隔离度的影响不会随着生境量的减少而增强。来自全球 35 项研究的 8 个分类群的数据支持这些预测。无论栖息地斑块的配置如何,减少生境损失对于保护物种密度都是必要的。