• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育扩张与生育率:来自挪威大学改革的证据

Educational Expansions and Fertility: Evidence from Norwegian College Reforms.

作者信息

Rogne Adrian Farner, Fauske Agnes, Hart Rannveig Kaldager

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Popul. 2025 Jun 2;41(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10680-025-09737-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10680-025-09737-7
PMID:40455089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12130375/
Abstract

Previous research has pointed to educational expansions and increased educational attainment among women as an important factor contributing to reductions in fertility levels and changes in family formation patterns in the second half of the twentieth century. We investigate one potential mechanism that may have contributed to these developments-the establishment of local colleges providing access to higher education for broader segments of the population. We study the establishment of regional colleges in Norway 1973-83. Taking advantage of population-wide administrative register data, historical data sources and recent developments in difference-in-differences methodology, we employ an event study design to assess the impact of local colleges on cohort fertility and age-specific fertility outcomes, as well as age at marriage and regional mobility as potential mechanisms. Our findings suggest that access to local colleges did not impact fertility, family formation or mobility to any substantial degree.

摘要

先前的研究指出,教育扩张以及女性受教育程度的提高是导致20世纪下半叶生育率下降和家庭形成模式变化的一个重要因素。我们研究了一个可能促成这些发展的潜在机制——建立地方学院,为更广泛的人群提供高等教育机会。我们研究了1973年至1983年挪威地方学院的设立情况。利用涵盖全人口的行政登记数据、历史数据源以及差分法的最新进展,我们采用事件研究设计来评估地方学院对同期群生育率、特定年龄生育率结果以及结婚年龄和区域流动性等潜在机制的影响。我们的研究结果表明,地方学院的入学机会在很大程度上并未影响生育率、家庭形成或流动性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/5b1a492f917c/10680_2025_9737_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/3f4bfd68a5fb/10680_2025_9737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/1aca688c0998/10680_2025_9737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/2aa44e3f7f87/10680_2025_9737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/fa007681807a/10680_2025_9737_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/0242b24c4a89/10680_2025_9737_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/5b1a492f917c/10680_2025_9737_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/3f4bfd68a5fb/10680_2025_9737_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/1aca688c0998/10680_2025_9737_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/2aa44e3f7f87/10680_2025_9737_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/fa007681807a/10680_2025_9737_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/0242b24c4a89/10680_2025_9737_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac9/12130375/5b1a492f917c/10680_2025_9737_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Educational Expansions and Fertility: Evidence from Norwegian College Reforms.教育扩张与生育率:来自挪威大学改革的证据
Eur J Popul. 2025 Jun 2;41(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10680-025-09737-7.
2
Analyzing the correlation between educational attainment and fertility.分析教育程度与生育率之间的相关性。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1995;7(2):135-48.
3
Education as policy: the impact of education on marriage, contraception, and fertility in Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia.作为政策的教育:教育对哥伦比亚、秘鲁和玻利维亚的婚姻、避孕及生育的影响
Soc Biol. 1998 Fall-Winter;45(3-4):194-213. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1998.9988973.
4
An analysis of the effects of fertility on women's spatial mobility in the Philippines.菲律宾生育对女性空间流动性影响的分析。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1991 Dec;6(4):35-66.
5
Universal Transfers, Tax Breaks and Fertility: Evidence from a Regional Reform in Norway.普遍转移支付、税收减免与生育率:来自挪威一项地区改革的证据
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(3):49. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09793-z. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Assortative mating and differential fertility.选型交配与生育力差异。
Biol Soc. 1986 Dec;3(4):167-70.
7
Contributions of other socio-economic factors to the fertility differentials of women by education: a multivariate approach.其他社会经济因素对不同教育程度女性生育差异的影响:一种多变量方法。
Genus. 1984 Jul-Dec;40(3-4):117-27.
8
An economic analysis of female work participation, education, and fertility: theory and empirical evidence for the Federal Republic of Germany.女性劳动参与、教育与生育的经济分析:德意志联邦共和国的理论与实证证据
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Part 2):S218-34. doi: 10.1086/298082.
9
Fertility differentials in rural Sierra Leone: demographic and socioeconomic effects.塞拉利昂农村地区的生育差异:人口和社会经济影响
Genus. 1991 Jul-Dec;47(3-4):171-82.
10
Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.北欧国家的教育、性别与同期群生育率
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 19;35(3):563-586. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. eCollection 2019 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of education on mortality: Evidence using college expansions.教育对死亡率的影响:利用大学扩招的证据。
Health Econ. 2024 Mar;33(3):541-575. doi: 10.1002/hec.4787. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.北欧国家的教育、性别与同期群生育率
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 19;35(3):563-586. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Migration and the Partner Market: How Gender-Selective Relocations Affect Regional Mating Chances in Germany.移民与伴侣市场:性别选择性迁移如何影响德国各地区的择偶机会
Eur J Popul. 2017 May 11;34(1):59-86. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9422-8. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
[Popular pill with questionable history].[有着可疑历史的常用药丸]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Oct 30;137(20). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0665. Print 2017 Oct 31.
5
THE SECOND DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION THEORY: A Review and Appraisal.第二次人口转变理论:综述与评价
Annu Rev Sociol. 2017 Jul;43:473-492. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
The Effect of Childhood Family Size on Fertility in Adulthood: New Evidence From IV Estimation.童年家庭规模对成年后生育能力的影响:来自工具变量估计的新证据。
Demography. 2017 Feb;54(1):23-44. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0537-z.
7
The second demographic transition: a concise overview of its development.第二次人口转变:发展概述
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18112-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420441111. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
8
Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment.生育推迟在很大程度上是由于受教育程度的提高。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2012 Nov;66(3):311-27. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2012.697569. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
The effects of social capital and social pressure on the intention to have a second or third child in France, Germany, and Bulgaria, 2004-05.2004-05 年,法国、德国和保加利亚的社会资本和社会压力对生育第二胎或第三胎意愿的影响。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2011 Nov;65(3):335-51. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2011.579148. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Increasingly heterogeneous ages at first birth by education in Southern European and Anglo-American family-policy regimes: A seven-country comparison by birth cohort.受南欧和英美家庭政策体制影响,初育年龄因教育程度而日益多样化:基于出生队列的七国比较。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2010 Nov;64(3):209-27. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2010.512392.