Phelps Emma Elizabeth, Tutton Elizabeth, Gould Jenny, Baird Liz, Achten Juul, Costa Matthew L
Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Major Trauma Centre, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 3;6(6):626-634. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2025-0033.
We sought to explore patients' experience of early recovery from a fracture of the wrist (distal radius). This study was nested in the DRAFT-CASP randomized controlled trial (RCT), which explores the effectiveness of two treatment pathways for patients with a fracture of the distal radius that does not require manipulation: a plaster cast which is removed in fracture clinic, versus a wrist splint that patients remove themselves without returning to hospital.
Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 21 adults (mean age 58.2 years (SD 13.96), six male), from eight NHS hospitals, four to ten weeks post injury. Interviews were informed by phenomenology and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
We identified the overarching theme 'striving to recover', which conveys patients' determination to get back to normal after a wrist fracture. To recover, patients needed to be comfortable, to adapt, and to be certain that their wrist was healing. Early in their recovery, they were unable to complete their daily activities, experienced pain, loss of strength, worry, and were cautious about using their wrist. Overall, both treatments were considered acceptable. The splint was advantageous for the freedom and control it provided. The cast was valued for the protection and safety it provided. Both groups required more information and reassurance, but had varied views on the need for follow-up appointments.
The splint made life easier for patients and was an acceptable treatment. Patients wanted reassurance that their wrist was healing, but they felt this could be achieved in a variety of ways. Most patients coped without a follow-up appointment. Innovative ways to maximize recovery are required. These include support for patients to, manage their pain and provide comfort, be able to adapt, and feel certain of healing. Sharing patients' experiences may help future patients to make informed treatment and recovery decisions.
我们试图探究腕部(桡骨远端)骨折患者早期康复的体验。本研究嵌套于DRAFT-CASP随机对照试验(RCT)中,该试验探讨了两种治疗途径对无需手法复位的桡骨远端骨折患者的有效性:一种是在骨折诊所拆除的石膏固定,另一种是患者自行拆除且无需回医院的腕部夹板。
对来自8家国民保健服务(NHS)医院的21名成年人(平均年龄58.2岁(标准差13.96),6名男性)在受伤后4至10周进行了定性访谈。访谈以现象学为依据,并采用反思性主题分析法进行分析。
我们确定了总体主题“努力康复”,该主题传达了患者腕部骨折后恢复正常的决心。为了康复,患者需要感到舒适、进行适应,并确定其腕部正在愈合。在康复早期,他们无法完成日常活动,经历疼痛、力量丧失、担忧,并且对使用腕部很谨慎。总体而言,两种治疗方法都被认为是可以接受的。夹板因其提供的自由和控制权而具有优势。石膏固定因其提供的保护和安全性而受到重视。两组都需要更多信息和安慰,但对随访预约的必要性有不同看法。
夹板使患者生活更轻松,是一种可接受的治疗方法。患者希望得到腕部正在愈合的保证,但他们觉得可以通过多种方式实现这一点。大多数患者在没有随访预约的情况下也能应对。需要创新方法来最大限度地促进康复。这些方法包括支持患者管理疼痛、提供舒适感、能够适应并确信正在愈合。分享患者经历可能有助于未来患者做出明智的治疗和康复决策。