Mbogo George Williams, Kroner Pia, Walsh Rosemarie, Newchurch Jonathan, Bleackley Mark Robert
Incannex Healthcare Pty Limited, Unit 105, 8 Century Circuit Norwest, NSW, 2153, Australia.
CMAX Clinical Research Pty Ltd, Level 5, 21 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(1):19357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04573-5.
This was a phase I randomised comparator controlled clinical trial that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), and tolerability of IHL-675 A, a fixed dose combination (FDC) of cannabidiol (CBD) and hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ), compared to the reference listed drugs Epidiolex (CBD) and Plaquenil (HCQ) in healthy volunteers (HVs). IHL-675 A is Incannex Healthcare Pty Ltd.'s proprietary product formulated using UniGel™ technology consisting of a solid, film coated HCQ tablet contained within a CBD-oil solution gel cap. Each IHL-675 A gel cap contains 75 mg of CBD and 100 mg HCQ. IHL-675 A is being developed for treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. This trial assessed the tolerability of IHL-675 A as well as pharmacokinetics of the active pharmaceutical ingredients CBD and HCQ as well as their major metabolites, compared to the reference listed drugs. The study included 3 treatment arms: IHL-675 A arm (150 mg CBD, 200 mg HCQ) and Plaquenil arm (200 mg HCQ) and Epidiolex (150 mg CBD) arm. Thirty-six participants were randomised into the 3 groups (12 per arm) and followed up for 4 weeks. Safety assessments including vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, and clinical laboratory parameters. Plasma concentrations of CBD, HCQ and their major metabolites, 7-OH-CBD, and 7-COOH-CBD, and desethylhydroxychloroquine (DHCQ), desethylchloroquine (DCQ), and bisdesethylhydroxy-chloroquine (BDCQ) were assessed at predefined timepoints across the monitoring period and PK parameters were determined and compared between treatments using noncompartmental methods and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of log-transformed values exposure PK parameters. All adverse events were coded using the current version of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MeDRA) by system organ class (SOC). IHL-675 A was generally well tolerated and had a similar adverse event profile compared to Epidiolex and Plaquenil. There were no SAEs reported in this study. Both CBD and HCQ were bioavailable when dosed in IHL-675 A. There were non-statistically significant differences between the pharmacokinetics of both CBD and HCQ when compared between IHL-675 A and Epidiolex or Plaquenil. There was approximately 50% increase in C of CBD for IHL-675 A when compared with Epidiolex, and a slight increase of approximately 10% in AUC and AUC. The 90% CI for the ratios of AUC, AUC and C of CBD all extended beyond the acceptance interval of 80% - 125%. The C of HCQ for IHL-675 A was comparable to the reference product Plaquenil, with a geometric mean squares ratio of 96.5%. There was approximately 15% decrease in AUC. The 90% CI for the ratios of AUC and C of HCQ extended beyond the acceptance interval of 80% - 125%. The ratio of AUC was not reliable for comparison between treatments, since the t was estimable for only 5 of 12 participants who received IHL-675 A. IHL-675 A was generally well tolerated when delivered as an oral fixed dose with no adverse events of concern or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Compared to the reference listed drugs for CBD (Epidiolex 150 mg) and HCQ (Plaquenil 200 mg), there was a slightly increased exposure to CBD and its metabolites for IHL-675 A, and slightly decreased exposure to HCQ. These results support the continued clinical development of IHL-675 A.Trial Registration: ACTRN12622000289718.
这是一项I期随机对照临床试验,评估了IHL - 675 A(一种大麻二酚(CBD)和硫酸羟氯喹(HCQ)的固定剂量组合(FDC))与上市对照药品Epidiolex(CBD)和Plaquenil(HCQ)在健康志愿者(HV)中的药代动力学(PK)和耐受性。IHL - 675 A是Incannex Healthcare Pty Ltd.的专利产品,采用UniGel™技术配制,由一个含有固体薄膜包衣HCQ片剂的CBD油溶液凝胶胶囊组成。每个IHL - 675 A凝胶胶囊含有75 mg的CBD和100 mg的HCQ。IHL - 675 A正在开发用于治疗类风湿性关节炎等炎症性疾病。该试验评估了IHL - 675 A的耐受性以及活性药物成分CBD和HCQ及其主要代谢物的药代动力学,并与上市对照药品进行了比较。该研究包括3个治疗组:IHL - 675 A组(150 mg CBD,200 mg HCQ)、Plaquenil组(200 mg HCQ)和Epidiolex(150 mg CBD)组。36名参与者被随机分为3组(每组12人),并随访4周。进行了包括生命体征、心电图(ECG)参数和临床实验室参数在内的安全性评估。在监测期内的预定时间点评估了CBD、HCQ及其主要代谢物7 - OH - CBD、7 - COOH - CBD、去乙基羟氯喹(DHCQ)、去乙基氯喹(DCQ)和双去乙基羟基氯喹(BDCQ)的血浆浓度,并使用非房室方法和对数转换值暴露PK参数的方差分析(ANOVA)确定并比较了各治疗组之间的PK参数。所有不良事件均使用当前版本的《药物监管活动医学词典》(MeDRA)按系统器官分类(SOC)进行编码。IHL - 675 A总体耐受性良好,与Epidiolex和Plaquenil相比,不良事件谱相似。本研究中未报告严重不良事件(SAE)。当以IHL - 675 A给药时,CBD和HCQ均具有生物利用度。与Epidiolex或Plaquenil相比,IHL - 675 A中CBD和HCQ的药代动力学无统计学显著差异。与Epidiolex相比,IHL - 675 A中CBD的Cmax增加了约50%,AUC和AUC略有增加,约10%。CBD的AUC、AUC和Cmax比值的90%置信区间均超出了80% - 125%的可接受区间。IHL - 675 A中HCQ的Cmax与对照产品Plaquenil相当,几何平均平方比为