Liang Yuwen, Xu Haonan, Lin Jie, Tang Wenqiang, Liu Xinlan, Gan Kunyuan, Wan Qiaodi, Du Xiaobo
Department of Oncology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation, Mianyang Central Hospital, 12 Changjiaxiang, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, People's Republic of China.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):985. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14407-2.
The radiomics model based on single imaging modality has been demonstrated as a promising approach for predicting the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, whether integrating multiple imaging modalities improve the performance of the radiomics model is undetermined. This study aims to develop a multi-modal radiomics model based on four imaging modalities, including ultrasound (US), mammography (MM), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer after NAT.
Patients who underwent surgery after NAT from January 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The radiomic features were extracted from the volume of interest on the four imaging modalities. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used for developing radiomic signatures. The multi-modal radiomics model was developed by combining four radiomic signatures. The combined model was developed by combining clinical risk factors and four radiomic signatures. A nomogram was developed to visualize the combined model. Model performance was internally validated by using the five-fold cross-validation.
In total, 89 patients were included, with the pCR rate of 31.5% (28/89). Multivariate analyses identified PR status (OR = 4.450, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.228-18.063, P = 0.028), HER2 status (OR = 9.95, 95% CI, 1.525-201.894, P = 0.044) and clinical T stage (OR = 0.253, 95% CI, 0.076-0.753, P = 0.016) were independent clinical risk factors for pCR. The AUCs and brier scores of the radiomic signatures of US, MM, CT, and MRI were 0.702 (95% CI: 0.583-0.821), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.660-0.865), 0.814 (95% CI: 0.725-0.903), 0.787 (95% CI: 0.685-0.889) and 0.198, 0.177, 0.165, 0.170 respectively. The performance of the multi-modal radiomics model was superior to all radiomic signatures with an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.838-0.970) and with the brier score of 0.111. After adding independent clinical risk factors, the performance of the combined model further improved, achieving an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.893-0.992) and a brier score of 0.082. The nomogram showed potential clinical value.
The multi-modal radiomics model based on US, MM, CT, and MRI could accurately predict pCR in breast cancer after NAT, which was superior to all radiomic signatures. Incorporating clinical risk factors may further improve the performance of the muti-modal radiomics model, which could provide valuable information for guiding treatment decisions.
基于单一成像模态的放射组学模型已被证明是预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗(NAT)反应的一种有前景的方法。然而,整合多种成像模态是否能提高放射组学模型的性能尚不确定。本研究旨在开发一种基于超声(US)、乳腺X线摄影(MM)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)四种成像模态的多模态放射组学模型,以预测NAT后乳腺癌的病理完全缓解(pCR)。
回顾性研究2019年1月至2023年7月接受NAT后手术的患者。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定pCR的独立临床危险因素。从四种成像模态的感兴趣区域提取放射组学特征。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子来开发放射组学特征。通过组合四个放射组学特征来开发多模态放射组学模型。通过组合临床危险因素和四个放射组学特征来开发联合模型。开发了一个列线图以可视化联合模型。使用五折交叉验证对模型性能进行内部验证。
总共纳入89例患者,pCR率为31.5%(28/89)。多因素分析确定PR状态(OR = 4.450,95%置信区间[CI],1.228 - 18.063,P = 0.028)、HER2状态(OR = 9.95,95% CI,1.525 - 201.894,P = 0.044)和临床T分期(OR = 0.253,95% CI,0.076 - 0.753,P = 0.016)是pCR的独立临床危险因素。US、MM、CT和MRI的放射组学特征的AUC分别为0.702(95% CI:0.583 - 0.821)、0.762(95% CI:0.660 - 0.865)、0.814(95% CI:0.725 - 0.903)、0.787(95% CI:0.685 - 0.889),brier评分分别为0.198、0.177、0.165、0.170。多模态放射组学模型的性能优于所有放射组学特征,AUC为0.904(95% CI:0.838 - 0.970),brier评分为0.111。添加独立临床危险因素后,联合模型的性能进一步提高,AUC为0.943(95% CI:0.893 - 0.992),brier评分为0.082。列线图显示出潜在的临床价值。
基于US、MM、CT和MRI的多模态放射组学模型可以准确预测NAT后乳腺癌的pCR,优于所有放射组学特征。纳入临床危险因素可能进一步提高多模态放射组学模型的性能,可为指导治疗决策提供有价值的信息。