• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

60 - 65岁接受机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术患者的生活质量

Quality of Life in Patients Aged 60-65 Years Receiving Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

He Meng, Zhang Jinwei, Yu Jianbo, Gao Xiaoqing, Ren Changwei, Lai Yongqiang, Cui Hao

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing, China.

Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases Beijing, China.

出版信息

Card Fail Rev. 2025 May 19;11:e12. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2024.40. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.15420/cfr.2024.40
PMID:40458287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127962/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients eligible for both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, postoperative quality of life (QOL) is a key factor in determining the type of prosthetic valve used.

METHODS

We reviewed patients aged 60-65 years who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our centre. Postoperative QOL was assessed through a telephone follow-up using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 628 valid survey responses were collected, comprising 353 patients with mechanical valves and 275 with bioprosthetic valves. The mean age of the patients was 62.5 ± 1.7 years, and 363 (57.8%) were men. The mean follow-up period was 7.3 ± 3.9 years. There were no significant differences in any QOL subscale or the overall 36-item Short Form Health Survey score between patients with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. BMI (β=-0.109, p=0.014) and postoperative time (β=-0.251, p<0.001) were the independent predictors of QOL, after adjusting for factors, such as age at the time of surgery, sex, ejection fraction, type of prosthesis and prosthesis effective orifice area index. The rates of stroke and cardiovascular reintervention per patient-year were similar between the two groups. However, in those 12 years after aortic valve replacement, mechanical valves seemed to perform better.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged 60-65 years undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement, there is no significant difference in postoperative QOL between those receiving mechanical or bioprosthetic valves, but mechanical valves seemed to perform better in the late period.

摘要

背景

对于有资格使用机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜的患者,术后生活质量(QOL)是决定使用何种人工瓣膜类型的关键因素。

方法

我们回顾了在我们中心接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术的60 - 65岁患者。术后生活质量通过使用36项简短健康调查问卷进行电话随访来评估。

结果

共收集到628份有效调查问卷回复,其中353例患者使用机械瓣膜,275例使用生物瓣膜。患者的平均年龄为62.5±1.7岁,363例(57.8%)为男性。平均随访期为7.3±3.9年。使用机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜的患者在任何生活质量子量表或总体36项简短健康调查问卷得分上均无显著差异。在调整手术时年龄、性别、射血分数、人工瓣膜类型和人工瓣膜有效瓣口面积指数等因素后,BMI(β=-0.109,p = 0.014)和术后时间(β=-0.251,p<0.001)是生活质量的独立预测因素。两组患者每年的中风和心血管再干预发生率相似。然而,在主动脉瓣置换术后的12年中,机械瓣膜似乎表现更好。

结论

在接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术的60 - 65岁患者中,接受机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜的患者术后生活质量无显著差异,但机械瓣膜在后期似乎表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c64/12127962/0c75b9a9149e/cfr-11-e12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c64/12127962/0c75b9a9149e/cfr-11-e12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c64/12127962/0c75b9a9149e/cfr-11-e12-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of Life in Patients Aged 60-65 Years Receiving Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.60 - 65岁接受机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术患者的生活质量
Card Fail Rev. 2025 May 19;11:e12. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2024.40. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Quality of Life Perceived by Patients with Bioprosthetic versus Mechanical Valves after Composite Aortic Root Replacement.复合主动脉根部置换术后生物瓣膜与机械瓣膜患者的生活质量感知比较。
Cardiology. 2016;133(1):3-9. doi: 10.1159/000438783. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
3
Age-Based Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valves.基于生物瓣与机械瓣的主动脉瓣置换术后年龄相关的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
Age-Specific Outcomes of Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Balancing Reoperation Risk with Anticoagulation Burden.生物瓣膜与机械主动脉瓣置换术的年龄特异性结局:权衡再次手术风险与抗凝负担
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jul 18;11(7):227. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070227.
5
Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.不同年龄组倾向性匹配患者中单纯机械瓣与生物瓣二尖瓣置换术的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 1;66(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae245.
6
National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的使用情况及院内结局的全国趋势。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1262-9.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.052. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
7
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves.生物瓣与机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的长期结果。
Heart Lung. 2025 Jan-Feb;69:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
8
Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.主动脉位置植入生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜的非老年患者的远期疗效比较:一项倾向匹配分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1931-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.042. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
9
Aortic Valve Replacement主动脉瓣置换术
10
Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study.在 Medicare 受益人群中,机械瓣膜置换与生物瓣膜置换术后的早期死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1788-95. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4300.

本文引用的文献

1
A chronological history of heart valve prostheses to offer perspectives of their limitations.心脏瓣膜假体的编年历史,以展现其局限性。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 14;13:1533421. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1533421. eCollection 2025.
2
Quality of Life of Patients Receiving Warfarin Therapy at a Tertiary Care Centre in Indonesia Using DASS (Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale).印度尼西亚一家三级护理中心使用 DASS(杜克抗凝满意度量表)评估接受华法林治疗的患者的生活质量。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2024 Aug 24;20:403-413. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S467656. eCollection 2024.
3
Mechanical or biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients aged 45 to 74 years.
45至74岁患者主动脉瓣置换的机械或生物假体。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;169(4):1234-1241.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.06.029. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Clinical Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement With a Mechanical or Biological Prosthesis.主动脉瓣置换术后机械瓣或生物瓣患者-假体不匹配的临床影响。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 Oct 18;50(5). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-22-8048.
5
Mediating effects of general self-efficacy on social support and quality of life in patients after surgical aortic valve replacement.一般自我效能感在主动脉瓣置换术后患者社会支持与生活质量间的中介效应。
Nurs Open. 2023 Oct;10(10):6935-6944. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1947. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Impact of Indexed Effective Orifice Area on the Quality of Life of Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement.经计算有效开口面积指数对主动脉瓣置换术后患者生活质量的影响。
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Jun 14;26(3):E249-E254. doi: 10.1532/hsf.5621.
7
Health Related Quality of Life of Ugandan Children Following Valve Replacement Surgery for Rheumatic Heart Disease.乌干达儿童风湿性心脏病换瓣术后的健康相关生活质量。
Glob Heart. 2023 Jun 23;18(1):37. doi: 10.5334/gh.1205. eCollection 2023.
8
Physical and Mental Recovery after Aortic Valve Surgery in Non-Elderly Patients: Native Valve-Preserving Surgery vs. Prosthetic Valve Replacement.非老年患者主动脉瓣置换术后的身心恢复:保留自体瓣膜手术与人工瓣膜置换术的对比
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Mar 23;10(4):138. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040138.
9
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
10
Impact of Valve Type (Ross vs. Mechanical) on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Young Adults with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后儿童和青少年的瓣膜类型(Ross 与机械)对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Jun;42(5):1119-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02589-y. Epub 2021 Apr 7.