Graoui Marwa El, Ghanem Michel Edmond, Amri Moez, Hijmans Robert J
Agrobiosciences department, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic university, Benguerir, Morocco.
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0324820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324820. eCollection 2025.
We present a framework to assess the ex-situ conservation status of plant species, by estimating the fraction of extant genetic diversity that has been conserved as seeds or other living material outside their natural habitat. We use a species distribution model to predict the area that is suitable for a species, and use inclusion and exclusion buffers to estimate its range. The range is divided into a number of zones that is proportional to the square root of its size. The geographic and environmental distance between zones is combined into a single distance metric that is used as to set weights on the links of a network connecting neighboring zones. An adjusted network is created by setting the distance between zones with seed samples to zero and halving the distance to neighboring zones for which there is no seed sample. The ex-situ conservation score (XC, between 0 and 1) is then computed as the reduction in the sum of the weights of the shortest paths between the nodes in the adjusted network relative to the sum the weights of the shortest paths in the original network. We adjust XC for small seed sample sizes and for the number of seed samples with unknown geographic origin. We illustrate our framework for 61 wild Vigna species in Africa. Twenty-three species were not conserved ex-situ (XC = 0), and 42 species had very low conservation scores (XC < 0.2). Range sizes were very different from the suitable area sizes predicted with the species distribution model (r = 0.09). The geographic and environmental distances were weakly correlated (r = 0.29), illustrating the importance of considering both. The Pearson correlation coefficient between XC and seed sample size for each species was 0.94, suggesting that seed sample size can be useful for quickly evaluating ex-situ conservation status.
我们提出了一个框架,通过估计在自然栖息地之外作为种子或其他活体材料保存的现存遗传多样性的比例,来评估植物物种的迁地保护状况。我们使用物种分布模型预测适合某一物种生存的区域,并使用包含和排除缓冲区来估计其分布范围。分布范围被划分为若干个区域,区域数量与分布范围大小的平方根成正比。各区域之间的地理和环境距离被合并为一个单一的距离度量,用于为连接相邻区域的网络链路设置权重。通过将有种子样本的区域之间的距离设为零,并将没有种子样本的相邻区域之间的距离减半,创建一个调整后的网络。然后计算迁地保护得分(XC,介于0和1之间),即调整后网络中节点之间最短路径权重总和相对于原始网络中最短路径权重总和的减少量。我们针对小种子样本量以及地理来源未知的种子样本数量对XC进行了调整。我们以非洲的61种野生豇豆属物种为例说明了我们的框架。23个物种没有进行迁地保护(XC = 0),42个物种的保护得分非常低(XC < 0.2)。分布范围大小与物种分布模型预测的适宜区域大小差异很大(r = 0.09)。地理和环境距离之间的相关性较弱(r = 0.29),这表明同时考虑两者的重要性。每个物种的XC与种子样本量之间的皮尔逊相关系数为0.94,这表明种子样本量有助于快速评估迁地保护状况。