Effect of using curing light manufacturer-recommended exposure times on the microhardness of resin composites.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effect of the light curing unit (LCU), light curing technique (LCT), and insertion technique (CIT) of resin-based composite (RBC) on the microhardness at various depths of RBC specimens.

METHODS

A mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) mold was used to make samples of conventional RBC (n = 3/group) using either an incremental (I) or a bulk-fill (BF) technique. The RBC was photocured using one of three different LCUs (Bluephase Style 20i for 15 s (I) and 10 s (BF), Monet laser for 1 s (I) and 3 s (BF), and Pinkwave for 10 s (I) and 20 s (BF). The LCUs were positioned either only over the center of the mold, or at three sites (side-center-side). The Vickers microhardness was measured at different distances from the top of the sample. Four-way ANOVA and Pareto chart analysis were performed (α=0.05).

RESULTS

All the experimental factors were significant (p ≤ 0.05). The Pinkwave produced the highest microhardness, followed by the Bluephase and Monet. Light exposure from the three sites produced higher microhardness than light exposure only at the center of the mold. The incremental technique resulted in higher microhardness than the bulk-fill technique. The depth of the RBC negatively affected the microhardness.

CONCLUSION

RBC microhardness varied depending on the type of LCU used. The Pinkwave delivered the most energy and produced the highest microhardness values.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

To ensure uniform microhardness of the RBC, the tip of the LCU should cover all aspects of the restoration (occlusal, mesial, and distal surfaces).