Rahimi Rod A, Smith Neal P, Selle Amandine, Best Roya, Martin Sidney, Tuttle Elizabeth, Ling Morris F, Medoff Benjamin D, Villani Alexanda-Chloé, Luster Andrew D
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA 02129.
Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA 02129.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 13:2025.05.08.652962. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.08.652962.
T cells play a central role in host protection against respiratory pathogens, but a maladaptive T cell response can lead to pulmonary diseases. Defining the biology of protective versus pathogenic T cell responses in the lungs of humans will be critical to nominate novel approaches to improve respiratory health. Previous studies have examined T cells from the lungs captured via bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), endobronchial brushings, or biopsies. However, whether these different approaches are capturing distinct T cell phenotypes and/or clonotypes remains unclear.
To evaluate and compare the transcriptional signatures of T cells isolated via BAL versus endobronchial brushings in healthy controls (HCs) and allergic asthmatics (AAs).
Flexible bronchoscopy was performed to obtain BAL and endobronchial brushings from 3 HC and 3 AA subjects. CD3+ T cells were sorted and single cell RNA- and T cell receptor (TCR)-sequencing was performed using the 10X Chromium platform. Unbiased clustering, differential gene expression analysis and TCR repertoire analysis was performed.
Unbiased clustering analysis allowed us to define 7 CD8 and 6 CD4 T cell subsets. The most significant difference in T cell subsets abundance between AAs and HCs was the enrichment of CD4 T helper type 2 (Th2) cells when comparing endobronchial brush samples (OR=26.2, P=0.002), but not when examining BAL (OR=1.7, P=0.46), indicating differences in the T cell subsets captured from the BAL versus airway mucosa specimen processing. In further support of this observation, comparing the BAL and brush T cells across all subjects revealed an up-regulation of resident-memory T cell markers (i.e. ) in brush T cells versus BAL T cells in both CD4 and CD8 lineages. In contrast, BAL CD8 and CD4 T cells exhibited an enriched type I and II interferon signatures compared to brush T cells. Lastly, TCR repertoire analysis revealed that brush T cells contained dramatically expanded TCR clones. Expanded T cell clones from the brush expressed high levels of resident-memory markers, suggesting the airway mucosa is enriched for T cells with unique TCR specificity.
Sampling T cells via BAL versus airway brushings yielded distinct T cell phenotypes and clonotypes with important implications for future research in lung immunology.
T细胞在宿主抵御呼吸道病原体的过程中发挥核心作用,但适应性不良的T细胞反应可导致肺部疾病。明确人类肺部保护性与致病性T细胞反应的生物学特性对于确定改善呼吸健康的新方法至关重要。以往的研究检测了通过支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)、支气管内刷检或活检获取的肺部T细胞。然而,这些不同方法是否捕获了不同的T细胞表型和/或克隆型仍不清楚。
评估和比较健康对照(HC)和过敏性哮喘患者(AA)中通过BAL与支气管内刷检分离的T细胞的转录特征。
对3名HC受试者和3名AA受试者进行可弯曲支气管镜检查,以获取BAL样本和支气管内刷检样本。分选CD3+T细胞,并使用10X Chromium平台进行单细胞RNA测序和T细胞受体(TCR)测序。进行无偏聚类、差异基因表达分析和TCR库分析。
无偏聚类分析使我们能够定义7个CD8和6个CD4 T细胞亚群。AA和HC之间T细胞亚群丰度的最显著差异是在比较支气管内刷检样本时CD4辅助性T细胞2型(Th2)细胞富集(OR=26.2,P=0.002),而在检查BAL样本时则不然(OR=1.7,P=0.46),这表明从BAL与气道黏膜样本处理中捕获的T细胞亚群存在差异。进一步支持这一观察结果的是,比较所有受试者的BAL和刷检T细胞发现,在CD4和CD8谱系中,刷检T细胞相对于BAL T细胞,驻留记忆T细胞标志物(即)上调。相反,与刷检T细胞相比,BAL CD8和CD4 T细胞表现出I型和II型干扰素特征富集。最后,TCR库分析显示刷检T细胞包含显著扩增的TCR克隆。来自刷检的扩增T细胞克隆表达高水平的驻留记忆标志物,表明气道黏膜富含具有独特TCR特异性的T细胞。
通过BAL与气道刷检对T细胞进行采样产生了不同的T细胞表型和克隆型,这对未来肺部免疫学研究具有重要意义。