Suppr超能文献

康复环境中技术的应用:治疗观察、混合方法分析与数据可视化

Use of Technology in the Rehabilitation Setting: Therapy Observations, Mixed Methods Analysis, and Data Visualization.

作者信息

Celian Courtney, Redd Hannah, Smaller Kevin, Ryali Partha, Patton James L, Reinkensmeyer David J, Rafferty Miriam R

机构信息

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Robotics Lab, Arms & Hands Lab, Chicago, IL.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Knowledge Translation: Exercise and Activity for Symptom Management (KTEAM), Strength & Endurance Lab, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025 Jan 6;7(1):100425. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100425. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption.

DESIGN

A convergent, mixed-methods study using therapy observations, semistructured templates, and summative content analysis.

SETTING

Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system.

PARTICIPANTS

Three research clinicians (1 occupational therapist [OT], 2 physical therapists [PTs]) observed approximately 78 OTs and 100 PTs (N=178).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors.

RESULTS

Ninety distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. Three hundred twenty-nine RT uses were documented over 44 hours, with only 42% of inventoried devices observed used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were associated with balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vital signs (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately electrically powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multiuse (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Setup times were brief (mean ± SD = 3.8±4.2 and 0.8±1.3min for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6±15min) than measurement RT (7.3±11.2min). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%) to their patients. Clinicians were evenly divided between providing one-on-one direct attention (49.7%) and multitasking (50.3%), such as completing documentation, when using RT with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in a tech-friendly hospital, most available RTs were observed unused, especially measurement technologies. We discuss how the identified characteristics of used RT, as well as the observations about how therapists used RT, may be useful in guiding new designs. An interactive data visualization page supplement is also provided to facilitate further exploration with this dataset.

摘要

目的

分析现实世界中康复技术(RT)的使用情况,以促进RT的开发和应用。

设计

采用治疗观察、半结构化模板和总结性内容分析的收敛性混合方法研究。

设置

单一医疗系统中的10个神经康复单元。

参与者

三名研究临床医生(1名职业治疗师[OT],2名物理治疗师[PT])观察了约78名OT和100名PT(N = 178)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

RT的特征、设置和使用RT的时间以及临床医生的行为。

结果

对15个不同重点领域的90种不同设备进行了清点。在44小时内记录了329次RT使用情况,仅观察到42%的清点设备被使用。RT在干预期间(72%)的使用多于测量期间(28%)。经常使用的干预设备与平衡/步态(39%)、力量/耐力(30%)和转移/移动训练(16%)相关。测量设备经常用于测量生命体征(83%),其次是握力(7%)和上肢功能(5%)。设备特征主要为电动(56%)、驱动(57%)、无监测器(53%)、多用途(68%)且几乎无需熟悉(57%)。设置时间较短(干预和测量的平均±标准差分别为3.8±4.2分钟和0.8±1.3分钟);干预RT的使用时间(25.6±15分钟)多于测量RT(7.3±11.2分钟)。RT几乎总是涉及口头指示(72%),临床医生向患者提供的关于表现的反馈(59.7%)多于关于结果的反馈(30%)。临床医生在与患者使用RT时,一对一直接关注(49.7%)和多任务处理(50.3%,如完成文档记录)的比例相当。

结论

即使在对技术友好的医院,大多数可用的RT也未被观察到使用,尤其是测量技术。我们讨论了已识别的使用RT的特征以及关于治疗师如何使用RT的观察结果如何有助于指导新设计。还提供了一个交互式数据可视化页面补充,以方便对该数据集进行进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc2e/12128602/ba5809091385/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验