Addressing controversy in nomenclature: what exactly does "" refer to?

The group () is historically composed of four subspecies ( subsp. , subsp. , subsp. , subsp. ). Although members are typically associated with oral disease, they have recently been shown to disseminate to the gastrointestinal tract and are associated with adverse health conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer (CRC). A growing debate over the nomenclature applied to taxonomy has resulted in different names for these lineages, shifting them from their historic subspecies designations to distinct species names (, , , ). This shift in naming scheme can lead to potentially significant confusion as "" can now refer to both the group () and a distinct lineage (; historically subsp. ). For example, the substantial body of literature documenting the involvement of "" () in CRC is seemingly contradicted by recent analyses showing that "" () is not enriched in CRC. However, this apparent contradiction is due only to changes in the updated naming scheme. Furthermore, discrepancies arising from this nomenclature shift can obscure the crucial role of other lineages in tumor biology, particularly that of subsp. /. Thus, the adoption of this nomenclature reclassification without careful consideration risks misleading non-experts and sparking misinterpretation of scientific literature and discourse. Here we elaborate on the challenges of the updated nomenclature scheme, propose tentative suggestions to improve accuracy and clarity, and call for a broader research community effort to discuss and implement a unified approach moving forward.