• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死后居家用药的障碍与促进因素:一项定性系统评价

Barriers and facilitators to managing medicines at home post-myocardial infarction: a qualitative systematic review.

作者信息

El-Komy Fatma, Sahm Laura J, Byrne Stephen, Bermingham Margaret, O'Driscoll Michelle

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, T12 YT20, Ireland.

Pharmacy Department, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01927-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-025-01927-x
PMID:40465180
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over three million people annually experience myocardial infarction (MI). As MI survival rates increase, so does the importance of secondary prevention medications. International guidelines recommend using several medications to prevent further morbidity.

AIM

To synthesise the qualitative literature on the facilitators and barriers faced by MI survivors and their families/caregivers regarding medication management and, thus, medication adherence post-discharge.

METHOD

This systematic review was conducted and reported following the PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Five databases were searched from inception until the 13th of August 2024. The inclusion criteria were articles focused on people aged 18 years or older who experienced MI and were discharged from acute care settings to home settings, as well as caregivers of individuals who met the above-mentioned criteria. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies with qualitative elements were deemed eligible for inclusion. The theoretical domain framework was used to analyse the findings. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool for qualitative research. The Confidence in the Evidence from the reviews of qualitative research approach was applied to assess confidence in qualitative evidence synthesis.

RESULTS

Of the 14,002 titles, 11,354 remained after duplicates were removed. Of the 234 full-text screenings, fifteen were included. A total of 533 people who experienced MI and 25 spouses from eight different countries were included. The most prominent facilitator that emerged was "beliefs about consequences", whilst "lack of knowledge" and "environmental context and resources" were the most prominent barriers to medication management reported.

CONCLUSION

Patients face multiple challenges that affect their medication adherence post-MI. These findings highlight important considerations for creating an individualised, tailored approach to enhance medication adherence post-MI.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023424844.

摘要

背景

每年有超过三百万人经历心肌梗死(MI)。随着心肌梗死生存率的提高,二级预防药物的重要性也日益凸显。国际指南推荐使用多种药物来预防进一步的发病。

目的

综合关于心肌梗死幸存者及其家人/照顾者在药物管理方面所面临的促进因素和障碍的定性文献,从而了解出院后药物依从性的情况。

方法

本系统评价按照PRISMA - 2020指南进行并报告。从数据库建立之初至2024年8月13日,对五个数据库进行了检索。纳入标准为聚焦于18岁及以上经历心肌梗死且从急性护理机构出院回家的人群,以及符合上述标准的个体的照顾者。包含定性元素的定性和混合方法研究被视为符合纳入条件。采用理论领域框架对研究结果进行分析。使用JBI定性研究批判性评价工具评估纳入研究的质量。采用定性研究综述证据的信心方法评估对定性证据综合的信心。

结果

在14,002个标题中,去除重复项后剩余11,354个。在234篇全文筛选中,15篇被纳入。共纳入来自八个不同国家的533名经历心肌梗死的患者和25名配偶。出现的最突出的促进因素是“对后果的信念”,而“知识缺乏”和“环境背景与资源”是报告的药物管理最突出的障碍。

结论

患者在心肌梗死后面临多种影响其药物依从性的挑战。这些发现突出了在制定个性化、量身定制的方法以提高心肌梗死后药物依从性方面的重要考虑因素。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42023424844

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to managing medicines at home post-myocardial infarction: a qualitative systematic review.心肌梗死后居家用药的障碍与促进因素:一项定性系统评价
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01927-x.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing pressure injury prevention and management guidelines in acute care: A mixed-methods systematic review.实施急性护理中压力性损伤预防和管理指南的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104557. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104557. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among ethnic Chinese children: a qualitative systematic review.促进华裔儿童身体活动的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Dec;18(12):2445-2511. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00154.
9
Barriers and facilitators to dementia care in long-term care facilities: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.长期护理机构中痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价和荟萃综合的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 1;13(11):e076058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076058.
10
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员遵守呼吸道传染病感染预防与控制(IPC)指南的障碍与促进因素:一项快速定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
2
Risk factors in cardiovascular patients: Challenges and opportunities to improve secondary prevention.心血管疾病患者的风险因素:改善二级预防的挑战与机遇
World J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 26;15(7):342-353. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i7.342.
3
The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting.在定性证据综合中使用 GRADE-CERQual:对忠实性和报告的评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 25;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3.
4
The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球心肌梗死的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03231-w.
5
Empowering Patients: Promoting Patient Education and Health Literacy.赋予患者权力:促进患者教育与健康素养。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):e27336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27336. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Impact of Personal, Cultural and Religious Beliefs on Medication Adherence among Patients with Chronic Diseases at University Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.个人、文化和宗教信仰对埃塞俄比亚西北部大学医院慢性病患者药物依从性的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jul 27;16:1787-1803. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S370178. eCollection 2022.
7
Facilitators and barriers for lifestyle change in people with prediabetes: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.糖尿病前期人群生活方式改变的促进因素和障碍:定性研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;22(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12885-8.
8
Causes of nonadherence to treatment in people with myocardial infarction: Content analysis.心肌梗死患者治疗依从性不佳的原因:内容分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Sep 30;10:330. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_92_21. eCollection 2021.
9
Conceptual Framework for Personal Recovery in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者个人康复的概念框架。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):e022354. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022354. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.