• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施模型对南非自我破坏量表进行心理测量评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the self-undermining scale in South Africa using the Rasch model.

作者信息

Peral Sergio L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Psychol Assess. 2025 May 20;7:163. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.163. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.163
PMID:40474876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12135889/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The self-undermining scale is used to assess employee behaviours that undermine job performance, including making mistakes, creating conflict, creating confusion and creating a backlog in work tasks. To date, its psychometric properties have not been thoroughly investigated using item-response theory applications, especially in South Africa. Applying the Rasch Rating Scale Model, this study aimed to investigate the reliability and internal validity of the self-undermining scale, including item fit and rating scale functionality. Data were collected from 318 South African employees using a non-experimental, cross-sectional survey design. The instrument demonstrated unidimensional scaling with Cronbach's alpha and person separation values of 0.77 and 1.57, respectively. Item and category fit statistics showed satisfactory fit to the Rasch model, with only one item warranting further attention. Some refinements regarding item wording and rating scale optimisation are provided.

CONTRIBUTION

This study is the first to investigate the reliability and validity of the self-undermining scale through the Rasch Measurement Model. It also offers cautionary insights into the applicability of the scale to measure self-undermining among South African employees because of the lack of discriminatory power. Recommendations for further validation studies are provided.

摘要

未标注

自我破坏量表用于评估破坏工作绩效的员工行为,包括犯错、制造冲突、造成混乱以及在工作任务中积压工作。迄今为止,尚未使用项目反应理论应用对其心理测量特性进行全面研究,尤其是在南非。本研究应用拉施评分量表模型,旨在调查自我破坏量表的信度和内部效度,包括项目拟合和评分量表功能。采用非实验性横断面调查设计,从318名南非员工中收集数据。该工具显示出单维量表特性,克朗巴哈系数和人员分离值分别为0.77和1.57。项目和类别拟合统计显示与拉施模型拟合良好,只有一个项目需要进一步关注。提供了一些关于项目措辞和评分量表优化的改进建议。

贡献

本研究首次通过拉施测量模型调查自我破坏量表的信度和效度。由于缺乏区分能力,它还对该量表在南非员工中测量自我破坏行为的适用性提供了警示性见解。提供了进一步验证研究的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b1/12135889/d06f6a265d8a/AJOPA-7-163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b1/12135889/10d17c2f1beb/AJOPA-7-163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b1/12135889/d06f6a265d8a/AJOPA-7-163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b1/12135889/10d17c2f1beb/AJOPA-7-163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b1/12135889/d06f6a265d8a/AJOPA-7-163-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the self-undermining scale in South Africa using the Rasch model.使用拉施模型对南非自我破坏量表进行心理测量评估。
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2025 May 20;7:163. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.163. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver self-efficacy in contributing to patient self-care scale in China.中国患者自我护理贡献照顾者自我效能感量表的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):1977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19534-2.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale using classical test theory and item response theory.运用经典测试理论和项目反应理论对中文版患者自我维权量表进行心理测量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91129-2.
4
Assessment of Acute Trauma Exposure Response for FIRE-EMS Personnel.消防急救人员急性创伤暴露反应评估
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):458-475.
5
A Rasch analysis of the High Potential Trait Indicator: A South African sample.高潜力特质指标的拉施分析:一个南非样本。
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2023 Feb 8;5:115. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.115. eCollection 2023.
6
Application of Rasch Analysis to the Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.应用 Rasch 分析评价老年听力障碍量表的测量性能。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1125-1134. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000832.
7
Development and validation of the symptom burden questionnaire for long covid (SBQ-LC): Rasch analysis.长新冠症状负担问卷(SBQ-LC)的编制与验证:Rasch 分析。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 27;377:e070230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070230.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Patient Activation Measure in Kidney Disease: Results of Rasch Analysis.肾脏病患者激活度量表的信度和效度:Rasch 分析结果。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun;16(6):880-888. doi: 10.2215/CJN.19611220. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
Psychometric properties of a COVID-19 health literacy scale in a sample of German school principals applying Rasch analysis.采用 Rasch 分析对德国中小学校长样本进行 COVID-19 健康素养量表的心理测量学特性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3118. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20648-w.
10
Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version.意大利下肢功能量表的拉施分析:维度洞察及改进的15项版本建议
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):532-543. doi: 10.1177/0269215516647180. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Burnout and self-regulation failure: A diary study of self-undermining and job crafting among nurses. burnout 和自我调节失败:护士自我破坏和工作重塑的日记研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3424-3435. doi: 10.1111/jan.14872. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Job Demands-Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout.工作要求-资源理论和自我调节:工作倦怠的新解释和治疗方法。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison.他人报告的反生产工作行为是否比自我报告提供了更多的增量贡献?一项元分析比较。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):613-36. doi: 10.1037/a0026739. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
5
In the eyes of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance.旁观者眼中的工作场所越轨行为:一种非自我报告的测量方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):207-15. doi: 10.1037/a0012605.
6
Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.护理研究中Rasch模型的应用:介绍与示例
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):380-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
7
The job demands-resources model of burnout.职业倦怠的工作要求-资源模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512.