Dong Jie, Li Ziping, Wei Peijian, Yan Yiming, Zhao Guangzhi, Ouyang Wenbin, Li Shiguo, Xie Yongquan, Wan Junyi, Xu Donghui, Zhang Fengwen, Zhang Gejun, Wang Shouzheng, Pan Xiangbin
Department of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, China.
National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Regeneration Medicine, 100037 Beijing, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 22;26(5):28800. doi: 10.31083/RCM28800. eCollection 2025 May.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the preferred treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, China's unique patient population presents distinct challenges, including a higher prevalence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) and severe valve calcification. This study used real-world clinical data from Chinese patients to assess the safety and efficacy of the SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) in TAVR, particularly in patients with BAVs.
This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled consecutive severe AS patients treated with SAPIEN 3 THVs via a transfemoral approach from June 2020 to March 2024. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, while secondary endpoints included procedural mortality, procedural success, conversion to surgery, coronary artery occlusion, THV-in-THV deployment, permanent pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular leaks (PVLs).
Among the 1642 enrolled patients, 56.0% had BAVs, and 44.0% had tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.90%. Propensity score matching revealed no statistically significant differences between patients with BAVs and TAVs in terms of 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42 to 5.36; = 0.531), immediate procedural mortality, procedural success, coronary artery occlusion, THV-in-THV deployment, permanent pacemaker implantation, or moderate to severe PVLs. However, a significant difference was found in the conversion rate to open surgery (OR: 5.07, 95% CI: 1.11 to 23.2; = 0.036).
This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable THVs in TAVR for Chinese patients with severe AS, including those with BAV stenosis. These findings challenge historical relative contraindications for TAVR in BAV patients and highlight the potential of TAVR in diverse patient populations. Larger prospective studies with extended follow-ups are needed to refine patient selection and evaluate longer-term outcomes.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的首选治疗方法。然而,中国独特的患者群体带来了不同的挑战,包括二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)和严重瓣膜钙化的患病率较高。本研究使用中国患者的真实世界临床数据,评估SAPIEN 3球囊扩张式经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)在TAVR中的安全性和有效性,特别是在BAV患者中。
这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了2020年6月至2024年3月期间通过经股动脉途径接受SAPIEN 3 THV治疗的连续性重度AS患者。主要终点是30天死亡率,次要终点包括手术死亡率、手术成功率、转为手术治疗、冠状动脉闭塞、THV-in-THV植入、永久性起搏器植入和瓣周漏(PVL)。
在1642名入组患者中,56.0%患有BAV,44.0%患有三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)。30天死亡率为0.90%。倾向评分匹配显示,BAV患者和TAV患者在30天死亡率(优势比(OR):1.51,95%置信区间(CI):0.42至5.36;P = 0.531)、即刻手术死亡率、手术成功率、冠状动脉闭塞、THV-in-THV植入、永久性起搏器植入或中重度PVL方面无统计学显著差异。然而,在转为开胸手术的发生率方面发现了显著差异(OR:5.07,95%CI:1.11至23.2;P = 0.036)。
本研究证明了SAPIEN 3球囊扩张式THV在TAVR治疗中国重度AS患者(包括BAV狭窄患者)中的安全性和可行性。这些发现挑战了BAV患者TAVR的历史相对禁忌证,并突出了TAVR在不同患者群体中的潜力。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究并延长随访时间,以优化患者选择并评估长期结果。