Peters Michael A, Jandrić Petar, Hayes Sarah
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Zagreb University of Applied Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2021;3(2):370-388. doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00211-7. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
New technological ability is leading postdigital science, where biology as digital information, and digital information as biology, are now dialectically interconnected. In this article we firstly explore a philosophy of biodigitalism as a new paradigm closely linked to bioinformationalism. Both involve the mutual interaction and integration of information and biology, which leads us into discussion of biodigital convergence. As a unified ecosystem, this allows us to resolve problems that isolated disciplinary capabilities cannot, creating new knowledge ecologies within a constellation of technoscience. To illustrate our arrival at this historical flash point via several major epistemological shifts in the post-war period, we venture a tentative typology. The convergence between biology and information reconfigures all levels of theory and practice, and even critical reason itself now requires a biodigital interpretation oriented towards ecosystems and coordinated Earth systems. In this understanding, neither the digital humanities, the biohumanities, nor the posthumanities sit outside of biodigitalism. Instead, posthumanism is but one form of biodigitalism that mediates the biohumanities and the digital humanities, no longer preoccupied with the tradition of the subject, but with the constellation of forces shaping the future of human ontologies. This heralds a new biopolitics which brings the philosophy of race, class, gender, and intelligence, into a compelling dialog with genomics and information.
新的技术能力正在引领后数字科学,在这一领域,作为数字信息的生物学和作为生物学的数字信息现在辩证地相互联系在一起。在本文中,我们首先探讨生物数字主义哲学,它是一种与生物信息主义紧密相连的新范式。两者都涉及信息与生物学的相互作用和整合,这引导我们进入对生物数字融合的讨论。作为一个统一的生态系统,这使我们能够解决孤立的学科能力无法解决的问题,在一系列技术科学中创造新的知识生态。为了说明我们如何通过战后时期的几次重大认识论转变到达这个历史转折点,我们尝试提出一种暂定的类型学。生物学与信息的融合重新配置了理论和实践的各个层面,甚至批判性理性本身现在也需要一种面向生态系统和协调地球系统的生物数字解释。在这种理解中,数字人文、生物人文或后人文都不属于生物数字主义之外的范畴。相反,后人文主义只是生物数字主义的一种形式,它调解生物人文和数字人文,不再专注于主体的传统,而是关注塑造人类本体未来的力量组合。这预示着一种新的生物政治,它将种族、阶级、性别和智力的哲学与基因组学和信息带入引人注目的对话之中。