• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导者权力与能动性—共融性取向作为组织特征对职场霸凌影响的调节因素

Leader Power and Agency-Communion Orientations as Moderators of the Effects of Organizational Characteristics on Workplace Bullying.

作者信息

Houghton Jeffery D, Oxarart Richard A, Heames Joyce Thompson, Buckley M Ronald, Carbo Jerry A

机构信息

John Chambers College of Business & Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506 US.

Campbell School of Business, Berry College, MT Berry, US.

出版信息

Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2021;33(3):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09379-x. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10672-021-09379-x
PMID:40477239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8204923/
Abstract

This conceptual paper suggests that the distinction between an autocratic and democratic leadership orientation may serve as an important moderator of the relationship between key organizational characteristics and workplace bullying. More specifically, we explore leader autocratic vs. democratic power orientations and leader agentic vs. communal orientations as the theoretical bases for developing a new model of perceived leadership orientation as a moderator of the relationships between certain key organizational characteristics and perceptions of workplace bullying behavior. Our model proposes differential moderating effects for both leader autocratic-democratic power orientation and leader agentic-communal orientation. Particularly, we contend that democratic and communal leadership orientations may lead to fewer perceptions of bullying in the workplace. We conclude with a discussion of our model's practical implications and suggestions for future research on this subject.

摘要

这篇概念性论文表明,专制型领导取向与民主型领导取向之间的差异可能是关键组织特征与职场霸凌关系的重要调节变量。更具体地说,我们探讨领导者的专制与民主权力取向以及领导者的能动与社群取向,以此作为构建一种新的感知领导取向模型的理论基础,该模型可调节某些关键组织特征与职场霸凌行为认知之间的关系。我们的模型提出了领导者专制 - 民主权力取向和领导者能动 - 社群取向的不同调节效应。特别是,我们认为民主型和社群型领导取向可能会减少职场中对霸凌行为的认知。我们最后讨论了我们模型的实际意义以及对该主题未来研究的建议。

相似文献

1
Leader Power and Agency-Communion Orientations as Moderators of the Effects of Organizational Characteristics on Workplace Bullying.领导者权力与能动性—共融性取向作为组织特征对职场霸凌影响的调节因素
Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2021;33(3):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09379-x. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
When timing is key: How autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts.时机至关重要:专制型领导与民主型领导在紧急情况下如何影响下属的信任。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 3;13:904605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904605. eCollection 2022.
3
Giving It a Shot with a Different Approach: Prosocial Strategies Moderate the Joint Effects of Agentic and Communal Goals on Bullying.尝试一种不同的方法:亲社会策略调节了进取型目标和社群型目标对欺凌行为的联合影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;14(7):583. doi: 10.3390/bs14070583.
4
Leadership styles and quiet quitting in school context: unveiling mobbing as a mediator.学校环境中的领导风格与消极怠工:揭示职场暴力作为一种中介因素
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1538444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538444. eCollection 2025.
5
Trust After Just 45 Seconds? An Experimental Vignette Study of How Leader Behavior and Emotional States Influence Immediate Trust in Strangers.仅仅45秒后就能产生信任?一项关于领导者行为和情绪状态如何影响对陌生人即时信任的实验性情景研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 9;10:2921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02921. eCollection 2019.
6
Exploring leadership capability and emotional intelligence as moderators of workplace bullying.探讨领导力能力和情绪智力作为工作场所欺凌的调节因素。
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Apr;21(3):553-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01372.x. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
7
Abusive leadership: A moderated-mediation through leader-member exchange and by organizational politics.虐待型领导:通过领导成员交换和组织政治的调节中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:983199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983199. eCollection 2022.
8
No Laughing Matter: Workplace Bullying, Humor Orientation, and Leadership Styles.绝非儿戏:职场霸凌、幽默取向与领导风格
Workplace Health Saf. 2019 Apr;67(4):159-167. doi: 10.1177/2165079918811318. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Agency and Communion From the Perspective of Self Versus Others: The Moderating Role of Social Class.自我与他人视角下的能动性与交融性:社会阶层的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 18;10:2867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02867. eCollection 2019.
10
Combined effects of workplace bullying and perceived organizational support on employee behaviors: does resource availability help?工作场所欺凌与感知到的组织支持对员工行为的综合影响:资源可用性是否有帮助?
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Nov;31(6):654-668. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1521516. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Laissez-Faire Leadership and Affective Commitment: the Roles of Leader-Member Exchange and Subordinate Relational Self-concept.自由放任型领导与情感承诺:领导-成员交换关系和下属关系自我概念的作用。
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(4):533-551. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
The Associations Between Workplace Bullying and Physical or Psychological Negative Symptoms: Anxiety and Depression as Mediators.职场霸凌与身体或心理负面症状之间的关联:焦虑和抑郁作为中介因素
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Dec 19;15(4):808-822. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1733. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
The value of lost productivity from workplace bullying in Ireland.爱尔兰职场欺凌导致生产力损失的价值。
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Jun 20;70(4):251-258. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa067.
4
Depression, suicide risk, and workplace bullying: a comparative study of fly-in, fly-out and residential resource workers in Australia.抑郁、自杀风险和职场欺凌:澳大利亚飞进飞出和驻地资源工人的对比研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):248-253. doi: 10.1071/AH18155.
5
The Relationship Between and Factors Influencing Staff Nurses' Perceptions of Nurse Manager Caring and Exposure to Workplace Bullying in Multiple Healthcare Settings.多医疗机构中护士对护士长关怀的认知及遭遇职场霸凌之间的关系和影响因素
J Nurs Adm. 2017 Oct;47(10):501-507. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000522.
6
The Role of Psychological Stress Reactions in the Longitudinal Relation Between Workplace Bullying and Turnover.心理应激反应在职场霸凌与离职的纵向关系中的作用
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jul;59(7):665-672. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001050.
7
Do gender differences matter to workplace bullying?性别差异对职场霸凌有影响吗?
Work. 2015;53(3):631-8. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152239.
8
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators.性别与领导效能感知:情境调节变量的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1129-45. doi: 10.1037/a0036751. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
Agentic and communal values: their scope and measurement.主体间性价值与共同体价值:内涵与测量
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(1):39-52. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.627968.
10
Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.自主的女性和共有的领导力:角色期望如何赋予女性高层领导者优势。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):221-35. doi: 10.1037/a0018204.