Siklos Pierre L
Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON Canada.
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo, ON Canada.
Int Econ Econ Policy. 2022;19(3):459-490. doi: 10.1007/s10368-021-00526-1. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
I revisit the 1918-20 pandemic and ask whether it led to a reversal in the rise of trade and financial globalization that preceded it. Using annual data for 17 countries for the 1870-1928 period, a variety of tests and techniques are used to draw some robust conclusions. Overall, the pandemic a century ago interrupted, but did not put an end, to the first globalization of the twentieth century. However, two blocs consisting of combatant and non-combatant countries, experienced significantly different consequences. Globalization was sharply curtailed for the combatant countries while there were few, if any, consequences for globalization in the non-combatant group of countries. That said, there was considerable resilience especially in trade openness among several of the combatant economies. Perhaps changes in the make-up of economic blocs, post-pandemic, is a fallout from shocks of this kind. While there are lessons for the ongoing COVID pandemics differences between the 1920s and today also play a role.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10368-021-00526-1.
我重新审视了1918 - 20年的大流行,并探讨它是否导致了此前贸易和金融全球化上升趋势的逆转。利用1870 - 1928年期间17个国家的年度数据,运用了各种测试和技术来得出一些可靠的结论。总体而言,一个世纪前的大流行中断了,但并未终结20世纪的第一次全球化。然而,由参战国和非参战国组成的两个集团经历了截然不同的后果。参战国的全球化进程大幅缩减,而非参战国集团的全球化几乎没有受到影响。话虽如此,一些参战国经济具有相当强的韧性,尤其是在贸易开放方面。也许大流行后经济集团构成的变化是这类冲击的一个后果。虽然对于当前的新冠疫情有借鉴意义,但20世纪20年代和当今的差异也起到了一定作用。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10368 - 021 - 00526 - 1获取的补充材料。