• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异常行为的前因:心理与非心理因素及伦理依据

Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications.

作者信息

Di Carlo Emiliano

机构信息

University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2022;34(2):169-191. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x. Epub 2021 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x
PMID:40477613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8435170/
Abstract

An integrative model of ethical justifications in organizations is proposed. The model recognizes the roles of psychological and non-psychological factors on the link between ethical theories and the ethical reasoning and, consequently, on the way operators justify themselves when accused of being against (or not favoring) the good of the company. This study wants to contribute to highlighting the benefits of the prevention of deviant behavior through a more profound comprehension of its antecedents. The analysis confirms the complexity of human beings, and the need for an integrated approach that leads to clarity and coherence among tools (e.g. mission, code of ethics, incentive system), people and among both people and tools. A central role is played by the dissemination of a culture that considers the firm as a real entity, with its own interest, that is separated from that of its stakeholders and which brings the purpose of the common good.

摘要

本文提出了一个组织中道德正当性的综合模型。该模型认识到心理和非心理因素在道德理论与道德推理之间的联系中所起的作用,进而认识到当经营者被指控违背(或不支持)公司利益时,他们为自己辩解的方式。本研究旨在通过更深入地理解偏差行为的前因,为凸显预防偏差行为的益处做出贡献。分析证实了人类的复杂性,以及采用综合方法的必要性,这种方法能使工具(如使命、道德准则、激励系统)、人员以及人员与工具之间实现清晰与连贯。传播一种将公司视为一个真实实体的文化起着核心作用,该实体有其自身利益,与利益相关者的利益相分离,并以共同利益为目标。

相似文献

1
Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications.异常行为的前因:心理与非心理因素及伦理依据
Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2022;34(2):169-191. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
2
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
3
Nurses' justifications for morally courageous acts in ethical conflicts: A narrative inquiry.护士在伦理冲突中道德勇气行为的理由:一项叙事探究。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 May;32(3):752-766. doi: 10.1177/09697330241284357. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
How LMX Differentiation Attenuates the Influence of Ethical Leadership on Workplace Deviance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment.领导-成员交换差异化如何减弱道德领导对工作场所偏差行为的影响:心理授权的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:693557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693557. eCollection 2021.
5
A Deeper Look at Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: An Integrative Ethical Decision-Making Framework to Explain Moral Pluralism.深入探讨自动驾驶汽车伦理:一个解释道德多元主义的综合伦理决策框架。
Front Robot AI. 2021 May 4;8:632394. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.632394. eCollection 2021.
6
Towards a Psychologically Realist, Culturally Responsive Approach to Engineering Ethics in Global Contexts.迈向全球背景下工程伦理的心理现实主义、文化响应式方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Apr 1;31(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00536-1.
7
Tools of war and virtue-Institutional structures as a source of ethical deskilling.战争与美德的工具——作为道德技能退化根源的制度结构
Front Big Data. 2023 Feb 17;5:1019293. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1019293. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychodynamic Therapy心理动力疗法
9
Development and testing of the ethical reasoning tool (ERT): an instrument to measure the ethical reasoning of nurses.
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Jun;25(6):1151-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251151.x.
10
Underpinnings of ethical reasoning in nursing.护理中伦理推理的基础。
J Adv Nurs. 1993 Dec;18(12):2003-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18122003.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.推理中的邓宁-克鲁格效应:未能识别无能的理论意义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1774-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7.
2
Best Practices: How to Evaluate Psychological Science for Use by Organizations.最佳实践:如何评估供组织使用的心理科学。
Res Organ Behav. 2011;31:253-275. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.003.
3
Goal setting as a health behavior change strategy in overweight and obese adults: a systematic literature review examining intervention components.目标设定作为超重和肥胖成年人健康行为改变策略的系统文献综述:考察干预措施的组成部分。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
4
Heuristic decision making.启发式决策。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
5
Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.以公司名义的不道德行为:组织认同和积极互惠信念对不道德亲组织行为的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):769-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019214.
6
Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities.实施不人道行为中的道德推脱。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(3):193-209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.
7
Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment.利益冲突与承诺冲突。
Prof Ethics. 1995 Spring-Summer;4(3-4):47-81. doi: 10.5840/profethics199543/413.
8
Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment.直觉与理性加工之间的冲突:当人们违背自身更佳判断行事时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 May;66(5):819-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819.
9
The case for motivated reasoning.动机性推理的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
10
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.奖励A却期望得到B的愚蠢行为。
Acad Manage J. 1975 Dec;18(4):769-83.