• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A note on regulatory responses to COVID-19 pandemic: Balancing banks' solvency and contribution to recovery.关于监管部门对新冠疫情的应对措施:平衡银行偿付能力与对经济复苏的贡献
J Financ Stab. 2022 Jun;60:101009. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2022.101009. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Banks' credit risk, systematic determinants and specific factors: recent evidence from emerging markets.银行的信用风险、系统性决定因素和特定因素:来自新兴市场的最新证据。
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 15;8(2):e08960. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08960. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Effect of COVID-19 on non-performing loans in China.新冠疫情对中国不良贷款的影响。
Financ Res Lett. 2023 Mar;52:103372. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103372. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Loan growth and bank risk: empirical evidence from SAARC countries.贷款增长与银行风险:来自南盟国家的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2021 May 14;7(5):e07036. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07036. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Countercyclical capital buffers and credit supply: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis.逆周期资本缓冲与信贷供给:来自新冠疫情危机的证据
J Bank Financ. 2023 Sep;154:106930. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106930. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
6
COVID-19 and lending responses of European banks.新冠疫情与欧洲银行的放贷反应
J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106236. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106236. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Bank capital buffer releases, public guarantee programs, and dividend bans in COVID-19 Europe: an appraisal.新冠疫情期间欧洲的银行资本缓冲释放、公共担保计划及股息禁令:一项评估
Eur J Law Econ. 2022;54(1):127-152. doi: 10.1007/s10657-022-09734-9. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
8
The benefits of banks' IT investments in times of trouble: evidence from loan loss accruals during the COVID-19 pandemic.银行在困难时期进行信息技术投资的益处:来自新冠疫情期间贷款损失应计项目的证据
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):149-171. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01100-0. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
COVID-19 and bank performance in dual-banking countries: an empirical analysis.双重银行体系国家中的新冠疫情与银行绩效:实证分析
J Bus Econ. 2022;92(9):1511-1557. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01093-w. Epub 2022 May 5.
10
Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses.银行业对新冠疫情的反应:银行特定因素及政府政策应对的作用。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial Sector Policy Response to COVID-19 in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies.新兴市场和发展中经济体金融部门对新冠疫情的政策应对
J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106184. Epub 2021 May 21.
2
Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情危机期间银行业的表现。
J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106305. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106305. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
3
Pandemic risk: how large are the expected losses?大流行风险:预期损失有多大?
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):129-134. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.199588. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

关于监管部门对新冠疫情的应对措施:平衡银行偿付能力与对经济复苏的贡献

A note on regulatory responses to COVID-19 pandemic: Balancing banks' solvency and contribution to recovery.

作者信息

Bitar Mohammad, Tarazi Amine

机构信息

Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom.

Université de Limoges, LAPE, 5 Rue Félix Eboué, 87031 Limoges Cedex, France.

出版信息

J Financ Stab. 2022 Jun;60:101009. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2022.101009. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfs.2022.101009
PMID:40477646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9035619/
Abstract

We discuss the implications on banks and the economy of prudential regulatory intervention to soften the treatment of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and ease bank capital buffers. We apply these easing measures on a sample of Globally Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and show that these banks can play a constructive role in sustaining economic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, an empirical analysis shows that prudential regulatory responses to COVID-19 along with high regulatory capital and low non-performing loans ratios are positively associated with economic growth. Thus, banks should maintain high capital ratios in the medium-term horizon to absorb future losses, as the effect of COVID-19 on the economy might take time to fully materialize.

摘要

我们讨论了审慎监管干预对银行和经济的影响,这种干预旨在放宽对不良风险敞口(NPE)的处理并放松银行资本缓冲。我们将这些宽松措施应用于全球系统重要性银行(G-SIBs)样本,并表明这些银行在新冠疫情期间维持经济增长方面可以发挥建设性作用。此外,实证分析表明,针对新冠疫情的审慎监管应对措施以及高监管资本和低不良贷款率与经济增长呈正相关。因此,银行应在中期维持高资本比率以吸收未来损失,因为新冠疫情对经济的影响可能需要时间才能完全显现。