Ayris Devante, Imtiaz Maleeha, Horbury Kye, Williams Blake, Blackney Mitchell, Hui See Celine Shi, Shah Syed Afaq Ali
Discipline of Information Technology, Murdoch University, Australia.
Joondalup Health Campus, Australia.
Intell Syst Appl. 2022 May;14:200068. doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200068. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
SARS-CoV2, which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is continuing to spread globally, producing new variants and has become a pandemic. People have lost their lives not only due to the virus but also because of the lack of counter measures in place. Given the increasing caseload and uncertainty of spread, there is an urgent need to develop robust artificial intelligence techniques to predict the spread of COVID-19. In this paper, we propose a deep learning technique, called Deep Sequential Prediction Model (DSPM) and machine learning based Non-parametric Regression Model (NRM) to predict the spread of COVID-19. Our proposed models are trained and tested on publicly available novel coronavirus dataset. The proposed models are evaluated by using Mean Absolute Error and compared with the existing methods for the prediction of the spread of COVID-19. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior prediction performance of the proposed models. The proposed DSPM and NRM achieve MAEs of 388.43 (error rate 1.6%) and 142.23 (0.6%), respectively compared to 6508.22 (27%) achieved by baseline SVM, 891.13 (9.2%) by Time-Series Model (TSM), 615.25 (7.4%) by LSTM-based Data-Driven Estimation Method (DDEM) and 929.72 (8.1%) by Maximum-Hasting Estimation Method (MHEM).
导致冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)正在全球持续传播,产生新的变种,已成为大流行病。人们不仅因病毒丧生,还因缺乏相应应对措施而死亡。鉴于病例数量不断增加且传播存在不确定性,迫切需要开发强大的人工智能技术来预测COVID-19的传播。在本文中,我们提出一种深度学习技术,称为深度序列预测模型(DSPM)和基于机器学习的非参数回归模型(NRM)来预测COVID-19的传播。我们提出的模型在公开可用的新型冠状病毒数据集上进行训练和测试。通过使用平均绝对误差对提出的模型进行评估,并与现有的COVID-19传播预测方法进行比较。我们的实验结果证明了所提出模型具有卓越的预测性能。与基线支持向量机(SVM)达到的6508.22(错误率27%)、时间序列模型(TSM)达到的891.13(9.2%)、基于长短期记忆网络(LSTM)的数据驱动估计方法(DDEM)达到的615.25(7.4%)以及最大哈斯汀估计方法(MHEM)达到的929.72(8.1%)相比,所提出的DSPM和NRM分别实现了388.43(错误率1.6%)和142.23(0.6%)的平均绝对误差。