Raes Annelies
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Etienne Sabbelaan 51 - box 7800, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Itec, Imec Research Group at KU Leuven, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(1):138-159. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
The global pandemic forced us to rethink education to fight Covid-19 and apply social distancing during lectures. Luckily, we could rely on earlier research into distance education in general, and more specifically, into synchronous hybrid learning. During synchronous hybrid learning both on-site and remote students are connected and taught synchronously in what we call at our university the 'hybrid classroom' or 'hybrid lecture hall'. In order to further substantiate this potential new normal, research is needed to investigate the influencing factors of engagement and learning in these new environments from a student and teacher perspective. In this study, two different hybrid learning designs and practices are explored and analysed through the lens of the activity-centred analysis and design (ACAD) framework. Next to this more qualitative approach, this study also presents quantitative results on the effect of the level of presence (on-site versus remote, with or without interaction) on conceptual and affective outcomes. In terms of the student perspective, this study did not find any significant differences between physical and remote presence regarding conceptual understanding, yet significant differences were found in regard of affective engagement in favour of the on-site students and remote students having the opportunity to interact. In line with the ACAD framework, our research found that successful learning and teaching activities are interrelated with set, epistemic, and social design decisions.
全球大流行迫使我们重新思考教育,以抗击新冠疫情,并在授课期间实施社交距离措施。幸运的是,我们可以依靠此前对远程教育的研究,更具体地说,是对同步混合学习的研究。在同步混合学习中,现场学生和远程学生相互连接,并在我们大学称之为“混合教室”或“混合讲堂”的环境中同步接受教学。为了进一步证实这种潜在的新常态,需要开展研究,从学生和教师的角度调查这些新环境中参与度和学习的影响因素。在本研究中,通过以活动为中心的分析与设计(ACAD)框架,对两种不同的混合学习设计与实践进行了探索和分析。除了这种更具定性的方法外,本研究还给出了关于在场程度(现场与远程、有无互动)对概念性和情感性结果影响的定量结果。从学生的角度来看,本研究发现在概念理解方面,现场学习和远程学习之间没有任何显著差异,但在情感参与方面发现了显著差异,现场学生和有机会互动的远程学生更具优势。与ACAD框架一致,我们的研究发现,成功的学习和教学活动与既定的、认知的和社会的设计决策相互关联。