Schuir Julian, Pöhler Ludger, Teuteberg Frank
Unternehmensrechnung und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Deutschland.
HMD Prax Wirtsch Inform. 2022;59(1):261-279. doi: 10.1365/s40702-021-00817-w. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
Due to significant technological advances, virtual reality (VR) has increasingly established itself on the consumer market in recent years. In particular, the standalone headset Quest 2, manufactured by Facebook subsidiary Oculus, achieved high sales figures and became the top-selling VR glasses to date. At the same time, the privacy policy of Oculus, which links the use of the Quest 2 to a Facebook account, triggered a controversial debate among privacy experts. The introduction of this privacy policy faced consumers with a dilemma: They have to decide whether to share sensitive data with Facebook when using low-cost Oculus devices or pay higher prices for alternative VR headsets. The Federal Cartel Office then initiated data misuse proceedings against Facebook, resulting in a halt of sales of the Quest 2 in Germany. In this paper, we examine how German consumers perceive this dilemma. Based on a conjoint analysis, we compare the relative importance of privacy policies, hardware features and prices in the purchase decision for VR headsets. We identify three distinct market segments with different purchasing decision heuristics. The findings result in seven recommendations for action to help VR manufacturers, developers, and consumer advocates adopt VR technology responsibly and broadly in the consumer market.
由于重大的技术进步,虚拟现实(VR)近年来在消费市场上越来越站稳脚跟。特别是由Facebook子公司Oculus生产的独立头戴式设备Quest 2取得了很高的销量,成为迄今为止最畅销的VR眼镜。与此同时,Oculus将Quest 2的使用与Facebook账户关联的隐私政策在隐私专家中引发了一场有争议的辩论。这一隐私政策的引入让消费者面临两难境地:他们必须决定在使用低成本的Oculus设备时是否与Facebook分享敏感数据,或者为其他VR头戴式设备支付更高的价格。联邦卡特尔局随后对Facebook发起了数据滥用调查程序,导致Quest 2在德国停止销售。在本文中,我们研究了德国消费者如何看待这一两难境地。基于联合分析,我们比较了隐私政策、硬件功能和价格在VR头戴式设备购买决策中的相对重要性。我们识别出三个具有不同购买决策启发式的不同细分市场。研究结果提出了七条行动建议,以帮助VR制造商、开发者和消费者权益倡导者在消费市场中负责任地广泛采用VR技术。