Strasburger Hans
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany.
Iperception. 2020 May 19;11(3):2041669520913052. doi: 10.1177/2041669520913052. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
Crowding has become a hot topic in vision research, and some fundamentals are now widely agreed upon. For the classical crowding task, one would likely agree with the following statements. (1) Bouma's law can be stated, succinctly and unequivocally, as saying that critical distance for crowding is about half the target's eccentricity. (2) Crowding is predominantly a peripheral phenomenon. (3) Peripheral vision extends to at most 90° eccentricity. (4) Resolution threshold (the minimal angle of resolution) increases strongly and linearly with eccentricity. Crowding increases at an even steeper rate. (5) Crowding is asymmetric as Bouma has shown. For that inner-outer asymmetry, the peripheral flanker has more effect. (6) Critical crowding distance corresponds to a constant cortical distance in primary visual areas like V1. (7) Except for Bouma's seminal article in 1970, crowding research mostly became prominent starting in the 2000s. I propose the answer is "not really" or "not quite" to these assertions. So should we care? I think we should, before we write the textbook chapters for the next generation.
拥挤现象已成为视觉研究中的一个热门话题,目前一些基本观点已得到广泛认同。对于经典的拥挤任务,人们可能会认同以下观点。(1)布马定律可以简洁明了地表述为,拥挤的临界距离约为目标偏心度的一半。(2)拥挤主要是一种周边现象。(3)周边视觉最多可延伸至90°偏心度。(4)分辨阈值(最小分辨角度)随偏心度急剧且线性增加。拥挤现象的增加速率甚至更快。(5)如布马所示,拥挤是不对称的。对于那种内外不对称,周边侧翼的影响更大。(6)临界拥挤距离对应于初级视觉区域(如V1)中恒定的皮质距离。(7)除了布马1970年的开创性文章外,拥挤研究大多从21世纪开始变得突出。我认为对于这些断言,答案是“并非如此”或“不完全正确”。那么我们应该在意吗?在为下一代撰写教科书章节之前,我认为我们应该在意。