• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bringing AI participation down to scale.

作者信息

Moats David, Ganguly Chandrima

机构信息

University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 3, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

出版信息

Patterns (N Y). 2025 May 9;6(5):101241. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101241.

DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101241
PMID:40486964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12142630/
Abstract

In 2023, OpenAI's Democratic Inputs program funded 10 teams to design procedures for public participation in generative AI. In this perspective, we review the results of the project, drawing on interviews with some of the teams and our own experiences conducting participation exercises. We identify several shared yet largely unspoken assumptions of the project and encourage alternative forms of participation in AI perhaps coming from outside the tech industry.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/a3ebbb5f2999/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/ef8bc80670bb/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/21839289fbd6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/baaf6f312fa9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/a3ebbb5f2999/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/ef8bc80670bb/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/21839289fbd6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/baaf6f312fa9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dcc/12142630/a3ebbb5f2999/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Bringing AI participation down to scale.
Patterns (N Y). 2025 May 9;6(5):101241. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101241.
2
Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models.情感提示会放大人工智能大语言模型中的虚假信息生成。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Apr 7;8:1543603. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1543603. eCollection 2025.
3
Privacy-ensuring Open-weights Large Language Models Are Competitive with Closed-weights GPT-4o in Extracting Chest Radiography Findings from Free-Text Reports.在从自由文本报告中提取胸部X光检查结果方面,确保隐私的开放权重大型语言模型与封闭权重的GPT-4o具有竞争力。
Radiology. 2025 Jan;314(1):e240895. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240895.
4
ChatGPT and mental healthcare: balancing benefits with risks of harms.ChatGPT 与精神健康保健:平衡获益与风险。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Nov;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300884.
5
Empowering personalized pharmacogenomics with generative AI solutions.利用生成式人工智能解决方案增强个性化药物基因组学。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20;31(6):1356-1366. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae039.
6
The Impact of Multimodal Large Language Models on Health Care's Future.多模态大型语言模型对医疗保健未来的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 2;25:e52865. doi: 10.2196/52865.
7
OpenAI's Sora and Google's Veo 2 in Action: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence-driven Video Generation Models Transforming Healthcare.OpenAI的Sora和谷歌的Veo 2的实际应用:对改变医疗保健的人工智能驱动视频生成模型的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Jan 17;17(1):e77593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77593. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Between consensus and contestation.在共识与争议之间。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Aug 15;30(5):786-95. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0040.
9
Integrating large language models in mental health practice: a qualitative descriptive study based on expert interviews.将大型语言模型整合到心理健康实践中:基于专家访谈的定性描述研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;12:1475867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1475867. eCollection 2024.
10
Radiology Gets Chatty: The ChatGPT Saga Unfolds.放射学开始健谈:ChatGPT的传奇故事展开。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 8;15(6):e40135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40135. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
AI has a democracy problem. Citizens' assemblies can help.
Science. 2024 Aug 23;385(6711):eadr6713. doi: 10.1126/science.adr6713. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases.从语言语料库中自动推导出来的语义包含类人偏见。
Science. 2017 Apr 14;356(6334):183-186. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4230.
3
Crafting a public for geoengineering.为地球工程塑造公众。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 May;26(4):402-417. doi: 10.1177/0963662515600965. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
4
Why should we promote public engagement with science?我们为什么要促进公众参与科学?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.