• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于机器学习的危重症患者房颤风险预测模型。

A machine learning-based risk prediction model for atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Alomari Laith, Jarrar Yaman, Al-Fakhouri Zaid, Otabor Emmanuel, Lam Justin, Alomari Jana

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 21;6(5):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.008. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.008
PMID:40496587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12147569/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in critically ill patients increases morbidity, hospital stays, and costs. Existing prediction tools are limited in intensive care unit (ICU) settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study developed a machine learning-based model to enable early AF risk identification and prevention.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients admitted to the ICU were identified from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV) database, including 47 clinical and laboratory variables. The primary outcome was AF within the first 48 hours of admission. Multiple machine learning models were trained to predict AF, with the top-performing model undergoing hyperparameter tuning. A compact model was developed using 15 variables and 2 novel features-one identifying patients 70 years of age or older with sepsis and another representing a composite score of pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and predictive values. SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis interpreted individual feature contributions to the model's predictions.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 46,266 ICU patients, with 4.6% developing AF within 48 hours. The CatBoost classifier model achieved an AUROC of 0.850 on the test set, while the compact model with new features yielded an AUROC of 0.820. SHAP analysis highlighted total serum magnesium, age, and the newly created features as key predictors of AF development.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models in predicting AF development in ICU patients. The compact model, with a satisfactory AUROC, can be a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients and facilitating timely interventions.

摘要

背景

重症患者的心房颤动(AF)会增加发病率、住院时间和费用。现有的预测工具在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中存在局限性。

目的

本研究开发了一种基于机器学习的模型,以实现早期AF风险识别和预防。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,从MIMIC-IV(重症监护医学信息集市-IV)数据库中识别出入住ICU的成年患者,包括47个临床和实验室变量。主要结局是入院后48小时内发生AF。训练了多个机器学习模型来预测AF,性能最佳的模型进行超参数调整。使用15个变量和2个新特征开发了一个精简模型——一个用于识别70岁及以上患有脓毒症的患者,另一个代表既往心脏危险因素的综合评分。使用准确率、受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和预测值评估模型性能。SHAP(Shapley加性解释)分析解释了各个特征对模型预测的贡献。

结果

该队列包括46266名ICU患者,其中4.6%在48小时内发生AF。CatBoost分类器模型在测试集上的AUROC为0.850,而具有新特征的精简模型的AUROC为0.820。SHAP分析突出了血清总镁、年龄和新创建的特征是AF发生的关键预测因素。

结论

本研究证明了机器学习模型在预测ICU患者AF发生方面的潜力。具有令人满意的AUROC的精简模型可以成为识别高危患者和促进及时干预的有价值工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/38b5be26a885/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/398206d7aaf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/8fc167bf371e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/fe507f7cc754/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/7ceb6fad0bd0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/612da707f029/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/38b5be26a885/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/398206d7aaf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/8fc167bf371e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/fe507f7cc754/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/7ceb6fad0bd0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/612da707f029/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6202/12147569/38b5be26a885/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning-based risk prediction model for atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.一种基于机器学习的危重症患者房颤风险预测模型。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 21;6(5):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.008. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
3
Interpretable machine learning model for new-onset atrial fibrillation prediction in critically ill patients: a multi-center study.用于预测危重症患者新发心房颤动的可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 29;28(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05138-0.
4
Machine Learning for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.用于预测冠心病重症患者急性肾损伤的机器学习:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 28;13:e72349. doi: 10.2196/72349.
5
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
6
Identification and Validation of an Explainable Prediction Model of Sepsis in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Multicenter Retrospective Study.脑出血患者脓毒症可解释预测模型的识别与验证:多中心回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e71413. doi: 10.2196/71413.
7
Prediction model of atrial fibrillation recurrence after Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with chronic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation based on machine learning algorithm.基于机器学习算法的慢性瓣膜病合并心房颤动患者 Cox-Maze IV 术后心房颤动复发预测模型。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jul 28;48(7):995-1007. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230018.
8
Machine Learning for Predicting Risk and Prognosis of Acute Kidney Disease in Critically Ill Elderly Patients During Hospitalization: Internet-Based and Interpretable Model Study.基于互联网的可解释模型研究:机器学习在预测住院期间危重症老年患者急性肾损伤风险和预后中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 1;26:e51354. doi: 10.2196/51354.
9
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU.用于预测ICU中缺血性中风患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jun;198:105874. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105874. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
10
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.

本文引用的文献

1
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
2
Development of a Risk Prediction Model for New Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients Using the AmsterdamUMCdb.利用阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心数据库开发内科-外科重症患者新发房颤风险预测模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 13;9:897709. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.897709. eCollection 2022.
3
Atrial Fibrillation Prediction from Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.
从危重病脓毒症患者中预测心房颤动。
Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 9;11(8):269. doi: 10.3390/bios11080269.
4
How machine learning is impacting research in atrial fibrillation: implications for risk prediction and future management.机器学习如何影响心房颤动研究:对风险预测和未来管理的影响。
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jun 16;117(7):1700-1717. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab169.
5
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.心脏手术后的术后心房颤动:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Dec;112(6):2084-2093. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.10.055. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation During Long-Term Implantable Cardiac Monitoring Following Cryptogenic Stroke.不明原因卒中后长期植入式心脏监测期间房颤的预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016040. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
Prevalence, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者新发房颤的患病率、结局及危险因素
Int Heart J. 2020 May 30;61(3):476-485. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-511. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Predictors of de novo atrial fibrillation in a non-cardiac intensive care unit.非心脏重症监护病房新发心房颤动的预测因素
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):166-173. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180022.
9
Atrial Fibrillation in the ICU.重症监护病房中的心房颤动。
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1424-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.040. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Factors Associated with the Incidence and Severity of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Critically Ill Patients.成年危重症患者新发房颤发生率及严重程度的相关因素
Crit Care Res Pract. 2017;2017:8046240. doi: 10.1155/2017/8046240. Epub 2017 Jun 15.