Van de Casteele Ibe, Plovyt Magalie, Stuchlíková Magdalena, Lanssens Michiel, Verschueren Ben, Denon Quenten, Van der Meeren Paul, McCafferty Sean, Gitsels Arlieke, Cornillie Pieter, Sanders Niek N, Vandierendonck Aster, Poelaert Katrien C K, Vanrompay Daisy
Ziphius NV, B-9052, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Laboratory for Immunology and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01877-x.
Mucosal vaccination generates protective immune responses directly at the primary site of STI infection. However, the delivery of nanoparticles is hindered by the mucus barrier at these mucosal surfaces. Due to this interference, research on mucosal administration of self-amplifying (sa)-mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP) is currently limited and inconsistent. Some progress has been reported for nasal mRNA vaccination. However, for STIs, protective immune responses are required at the urogenital tract, which is achieved through intravaginal or intranasal administration. Therefore, in this research, we aimed to determine whether an sa-mRNA-LNP reporter vaccine could be effectively administered mucosally, evaluating its potential as a novel platform for STI vaccination. The sa-mRNA luciferase construct was encapsulated in two LNP formulations. In vitro studies demonstrated that these formulations maintained their potency after being sprayed with different sprayers and exposed to different mucus solutions, except for a human cervicovaginal simulant. Next, pigs received 15 µg of the sa-mRNA intravaginally and intranasally through a mucosal spray or injection. The mucosal spray resulted in expression and uptake only at the vaginal mucosa, whereas injection of the formulations resulted in expression at both mucosal sites. However, expression after spraying in the vaginal mucosa disappeared by day 4 post-administration. No differences were observed between both LNP formulations. These findings demonstrate that sa-mRNA can be used for mucosal administration, and expression can be achieved in a more relevant animal model. However, additional research is needed to develop more suitable particles for these complex environments.
黏膜疫苗接种可直接在性传播感染(STI)的主要感染部位产生保护性免疫反应。然而,纳米颗粒在这些黏膜表面会受到黏液屏障的阻碍。由于这种干扰,目前关于脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)包裹的自扩增(sa)-mRNA黏膜给药的研究有限且不一致。鼻内mRNA疫苗接种已取得一些进展。然而,对于性传播感染,需要在泌尿生殖道产生保护性免疫反应,这可通过阴道内或鼻内给药来实现。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定sa-mRNA-LNP报告疫苗是否能有效地进行黏膜给药,评估其作为性传播感染疫苗接种新平台的潜力。sa-mRNA荧光素酶构建体被包裹在两种LNP制剂中。体外研究表明,除了人宫颈阴道模拟物外,这些制剂在用不同喷雾器喷雾并暴露于不同黏液溶液后仍保持其效力。接下来,猪通过黏膜喷雾或注射经阴道和鼻内接受15μg的sa-mRNA。黏膜喷雾仅在阴道黏膜导致表达和摄取,而制剂注射则在两个黏膜部位均导致表达。然而,给药后第4天,阴道黏膜喷雾后的表达消失。两种LNP制剂之间未观察到差异。这些发现表明,sa-mRNA可用于黏膜给药,并且可以在更相关的动物模型中实现表达。然而,需要进一步研究来开发更适合这些复杂环境的颗粒。