Bonnefoy Théo, Tarris Georges, Guillen Kévin, Poupardin Olivia, Chevallier Olivier, Aho Glele Ludwig Serge, Correas Jean-Michel, Loffroy Romaric
Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Department of Pathology, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP, 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Res Diagn Interv Imaging. 2025 May 27;14:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.redii.2025.100061. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for small tumors. To achieve local disease control, the entire tumor and a surrounding safety margin must be destroyed. Power and application time are chosen based on manufacturer-provided data, usually obtained from ex vivo animal models. However, ex vivo tissues differ from in vivo condition due to compositional changes and absence of heat dissipation by blood flow. This study aimed to compare in vivo ablation zone sizes in swine with those predicted by the device manufacturer.
Five pigs underwent 40 microwave ablation procedures using various power-time-organ combinations; 18 hepatic and 20 renal zones were evaluable. All procedures were performed with devices from a single manufacturer (ECO Microwave System Co, Nanjing, China). After euthanasia, the ablation zones were excised and sliced. For each ablation, the slice showing the largest dimensions was selected to measure x and y diameters and used to compute the ablated surface area.
For seven of eight power-time-organ combinations, significant differences were found between predicted and measured surface areas ( < 0.05), with deviations ranging from -45 % to +54 %. The overall mean absolute differences between measured and predicted ablation sizes in the x and y dimensions and the ablation surface area were 7.6 ± 4.6 mm (28 % ± 19 %), 5.8 ± 4.3 mm (18 % ± 13 %) and 273 ± 210 mm² (39 % ± 34 %), respectively.
Manufacturer-provided predictive data for microwave ablation zone size may lack reliability. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of ablation zone size is crucial to ensure complete tumor destruction with adequate margins.
经皮微波消融是治疗小肿瘤的一种有效且微创的方法。为实现局部疾病控制,必须破坏整个肿瘤及其周围的安全边缘。功率和应用时间是根据制造商提供的数据选择的,这些数据通常来自体外动物模型。然而,由于成分变化和血流散热的缺失,体外组织与体内情况不同。本研究旨在比较猪体内消融区大小与设备制造商预测的大小。
五头猪使用各种功率 - 时间 - 器官组合进行了40次微波消融手术;18个肝区和20个肾区可进行评估。所有手术均使用来自单一制造商(中国南京ECO微波系统有限公司)的设备进行。安乐死后,切除消融区并切片。对于每次消融,选择显示最大尺寸的切片来测量x和y直径,并用于计算消融表面积。
在八种功率 - 时间 - 器官组合中的七种中,预测表面积与测量表面积之间存在显著差异(<0.05),偏差范围为 - 45%至 + 54%。在x和y维度上测量的和预测的消融大小以及消融表面积之间的总体平均绝对差异分别为7.6±4.6毫米(28%±19%)、5.8±4.3毫米(18%±13%)和273±210平方毫米(39%±34%)。
制造商提供的微波消融区大小的预测数据可能缺乏可靠性。术中及术后监测消融区大小对于确保肿瘤被完全破坏并具有足够的边缘至关重要。