Suppr超能文献

前嵴间线是用于识别腰4/5椎间盘水平的一种新的、准确的体表标志:一项与荧光镜检查相关的前瞻性一致性研究。

The anterior intercrest line is a novel, accurate surface marking for identifying the L4/5 disc level: a prospective agreement study with fluoroscopy.

作者信息

Claydon Matthew H, Biddau Dean T, Claydon Stephanie G, McKenzie Dean P, Malham Gregory M

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Epworth Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Spine Surgery Research Foundation, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 May 3;22:100615. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100615. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been no previous reports of reliable surface landmarks for determining the optimal incision site for anterior lumbar spine access without fluoroscopy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the anterior intercrest line for predicting the surface projection of the L4/5 disc level, compared with the fluoroscopically determined level.

METHODS

Prospective agreement study of consecutive patients without transitional anatomy undergoing anterior exposure for either interbody fusion or total disc replacement surgery at L4/5. The primary outcome measure was the distance from the symphysis pubis to the skin markings for the L4/5 level, as determined by the intercrest line method or fluoroscopic method. The anterior intercrest line was determined by placing a silk tie between the bilateral iliac crests palpated in the mid-axillary line. The skin was marked in the anterior midline along this line. The surface projection of the L4/5 disc was determined using lateral fluoroscopy and marked in the anterior midline. The distance between the upper palpable margin of the symphysis pubis and each L4/5 skin mark was measured. The marking modality difference (MMD) was the difference in distance between the 2 methods.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients (49 males, 32 females) the MMD was 0.36 ± 1.19 cm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between distances determined by the 2 methods was 0.84, demonstrating high agreement between the techniques. Single predictor and multiple linear regression analyses revealed no significant associations between MMD and age, sex, BMI, or operative position.

CONCLUSION

There was high agreement between the anterior intercrest line method and fluoroscopy for determining the surface projection of the L4/5 disc. The anterior intercrest line is a simple, clinically accurate, and reliable tool for planning the location of the skin incision for anterior exposure of the L4/5 disc level. Using this line would reduce radiation exposure, overall operative times, and costs.

摘要

背景

以往尚无关于在无透视情况下确定腰椎前路手术最佳切口部位的可靠体表标志的报道。我们旨在评估髂前嵴连线预测L4/5椎间盘水平体表投影的准确性,并与透视确定的水平进行比较。

方法

对连续的无移行解剖结构且在L4/5行椎间融合或全椎间盘置换手术而行前路暴露的患者进行前瞻性一致性研究。主要观察指标是耻骨联合至L4/5水平皮肤标记点的距离,该距离通过髂前嵴连线法或透视法确定。髂前嵴连线通过在腋中线触摸到的双侧髂嵴之间放置一根丝线来确定。沿此线在腹中线标记皮肤。使用侧位透视确定L4/5椎间盘的体表投影并在腹中线标记。测量耻骨联合可触及上缘与每个L4/5皮肤标记点之间的距离。标记方式差异(MMD)是两种方法之间距离的差异。

结果

81例患者(49例男性,32例女性)的MMD为0.36±1.19cm。两种方法确定的距离之间的组内相关系数为0.84,表明两种技术之间具有高度一致性。单预测因素和多元线性回归分析显示,MMD与年龄、性别、BMI或手术体位之间无显著关联。

结论

髂前嵴连线法与透视法在确定L4/5椎间盘体表投影方面具有高度一致性。髂前嵴连线是一种简单、临床准确且可靠的工具,用于规划L4/5椎间盘水平前路暴露的皮肤切口位置。使用此线可减少辐射暴露、总体手术时间和成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验