Chakraverty Robin, Pynsent Paul, Isaacs Karen
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
J Anat. 2007 Feb;210(2):232-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00686.x.
The line joining the superior aspect of the iliac crests posteriorly (the intercristal line) is commonly stated to cross the midline at the L4 or L4-5 spinal level on imaging. This study aimed to assess the spinal level identified through palpation of surface anatomy (iliac crests and posterior superior iliac spines) in adults and the level of agreement compared with the intercristal line identified through imaging. The study participants included consecutive adult patients undergoing prone fluoroscopically guided spinal injections for chronic low back pain at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, between April and July 2004. Prior to fluoroscopic imaging, each patient's surface anatomy was palpated by two examiners and lines created to form the palpated intercristal line and the posterior superior iliac spine line. Following imaging, the mid-line spinal levels identified by these palpated lines were recorded and the level of agreement (kappa coefficient) with the intercristal line formed by imaging of the iliac crests was assessed. The results showed that although the L4 or L4-5 spinal levels were identified on imaging of the intercristal line in 86.7% of 75 patients (49 female), the intercristal line formed through palpation tended to identify higher levels; the L3 or L3-4 spinal levels in 77.3% of cases and more commonly in females than in males (85.7 vs. 61.5%) and in patients with higher body mass indices. The level of agreement between the two lines was poor (kappa = 0.05). The posterior superior iliac spine line identified the S2 spinous process in 51% and the S1 in 44% of 60 (45 female) patients. The results suggest that formation of the intercristal line by palpation of the iliac crests identifies different spinal levels to those identified by imaging and that both methods should be regarded as different instruments. In the clinical situation, it may be more appropriate to consider that palpation of the intercristal line is a guide for identifying the L3 or L3-4 spinal levels rather than the L4 or L4-5 levels, particularly in females and patients with higher body mass indices.
在影像学上,连接双侧髂嵴最高点的连线(髂嵴间线)通常被认为在L4或L4 - 5脊髓节段水平穿过中线。本研究旨在评估通过触诊体表解剖标志(髂嵴和髂后上棘)确定的脊髓节段水平,并与通过影像学确定的髂嵴间线进行对比,评估二者的一致性。研究参与者为2004年4月至7月间在伯明翰皇家骨科医院因慢性下腰痛接受俯卧位透视引导下脊柱注射的成年连续患者。在透视成像前,由两名检查者触诊每位患者的体表解剖标志,并绘制出形成触诊髂嵴间线和髂后上棘线。成像后,记录这些触诊线所确定的中线脊髓节段水平,并评估其与通过髂嵴影像学形成的髂嵴间线的一致性水平(kappa系数)。结果显示,虽然在75例患者(49例女性)中,86.7%的髂嵴间线影像学检查确定为L4或L4 - 5脊髓节段水平,但通过触诊形成的髂嵴间线往往确定的节段更高;77.3%的病例为L3或L3 - 4脊髓节段水平,女性比男性更常见(85.7%对61.5%),且在体重指数较高的患者中也更常见。两条线之间的一致性较差(kappa = 0.05)。在60例(45例女性)患者中,髂后上棘线确定S2棘突的占51%,确定S1棘突的占44%。结果表明,通过触诊髂嵴形成的髂嵴间线所确定的脊髓节段与影像学确定的不同,两种方法应被视为不同的手段。在临床情况下,或许更合适的是认为触诊髂嵴间线是确定L3或L3 - 4脊髓节段水平的一个指南,而非L4或L4 - 5水平,尤其是在女性和体重指数较高的患者中。