• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)领域的系统证据图谱

Systematic Evidence Map for the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Universe.

作者信息

Shirke Avanti V, Radke Elizabeth G, Jones Ryan, Allen Barrett D, Lin Cynthia J, Ross Amanda, Vetter Nicole, Lemeris Courtney, Hartman Pamela, Eftim Sorina, Varghese Arun, Blain Robyn, Hubbard Heidi, Williams Antony J, Thayer Kristina A, Carlson Laura M

机构信息

1Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Chemical and Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Health and Environmental Effects Assessment Division (HEEAD), U.S. EPA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1289/EHP16952.

DOI:10.1289/EHP16952
PMID:40505091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a research priority for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Because PFAS include thousands of structurally diverse chemicals, there is a pressing need for identifying what data are available to assess the human health hazard of these compounds.

OBJECTIVES

We used systematic evidence map (SEM) methods to summarize the available epidemiological and mammalian bioassay evidence for ∿14,735 chemicals identified as PFAS by EPA's Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE). This work is a continuation of our previous 2022 and 2024 SEMs that inventoried evidence on a separate set of ∿500 PFAS. The Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard includes evidence identified from our past SEMs and completed EPA assessments.

METHODS

We conducted literature searches from peer-reviewed and gray literature sources to identify, screen, and inventory mammalian bioassay and epidemiological literature. A combination of manual review and machine learning software were utilized. A diverse array of potentially relevant supplemental content was also tracked, including mechanistic data, exposure-only studies, and studies informing chemical toxicokinetics and clearance. For each study meeting predefined population, exposure, comparator, and outcome (PECO) criteria, experimental design details and health endpoints evaluated were summarized in interactive web-based literature inventory visuals. Epidemiology studies and animal bioassay studies with ≥21-day exposure duration or reproductive/developmental study design proceeded to undergo a study evaluation for risk of bias and sensitivity, as well as detailed extraction of health endpoint data. Underlying data are publicly available and can be downloaded.

RESULTS

Scientific database searches retrieved 152,205 references. After full-text screening, there were 347 mammalian bioassay and 44 epidemiological studies that met PECO criteria. The mammalian bioassay and epidemiological evidence assessed 99 and 30 individual PFAS, respectively (n = 18 PFAS with both). The epidemiological evidence assessed 15 health systems and the mammalian bioassay evidence assessed 16 health systems.

DISCUSSION

Results from our 2022 and 2024 SEMs and completed EPA assessments are compiled into Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard. This dashboard is a resource for better understanding the currently available PFAS human health hazard data. It can be used as a tool for researchers and regulators interested in PFAS data gaps and research needs. Across all the data sources compiled into the Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard, only 1.4% (214/14,735) of PFAS had any mammalian bioassay or epidemiological data available. The vast majority of PFAS lack publicly available information about the potential human health effects of exposure to these chemicals.. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952.

摘要

背景

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是美国环境保护局(EPA)的一项研究重点。由于PFAS包含数千种结构各异的化学物质,因此迫切需要确定有哪些数据可用于评估这些化合物对人类健康的危害。

目的

我们使用系统证据图谱(SEM)方法,总结了美国环境保护局计算毒理学与暴露中心(CCTE)确定为PFAS的约14,735种化学物质的现有流行病学和哺乳动物生物测定证据。这项工作是我们之前2022年和2024年SEM的延续,之前的SEM对另一组约500种PFAS的证据进行了编目。综合PFAS仪表板包括从我们过去的SEM和已完成的EPA评估中确定的证据。

方法

我们对同行评审和灰色文献来源进行了文献检索,以识别、筛选和编目哺乳动物生物测定和流行病学文献。采用了人工评审和机器学习软件相结合的方法。还跟踪了一系列潜在相关的补充内容,包括机制数据、仅涉及暴露的研究以及为化学毒物代谢动力学和清除提供信息的研究。对于每项符合预定义的人群、暴露、对照和结局(PECO)标准的研究,在基于网络的交互式文献编目可视化工具中总结了实验设计细节和评估的健康终点。暴露持续时间≥21天的流行病学研究和动物生物测定研究或生殖/发育研究设计进入偏倚风险和敏感性研究评估,以及健康终点数据的详细提取。基础数据可公开获取并可下载。

结果

科学数据库检索到152,205条参考文献。经过全文筛选,有347项哺乳动物生物测定研究和44项流行病学研究符合PECO标准。哺乳动物生物测定和流行病学证据分别评估了99种和30种单个PFAS(其中18种PFAS两者都有评估)。流行病学证据评估了15个健康系统,哺乳动物生物测定证据评估了16个健康系统。

讨论

我们2022年和2024年SEM的结果以及已完成的EPA评估被汇编到综合PFAS仪表板中。该仪表板是一个有助于更好地了解当前可用的PFAS对人类健康危害数据的资源。它可以用作对PFAS数据缺口和研究需求感兴趣的研究人员和监管机构的工具。在综合PFAS仪表板汇编的所有数据源中,只有1.4%(214/14,735)的PFAS有任何哺乳动物生物测定或流行病学数据。绝大多数PFAS缺乏关于接触这些化学物质对人类健康潜在影响的公开信息。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952 。

相似文献

1
Systematic Evidence Map for the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Universe.全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)领域的系统证据图谱
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1289/EHP16952.
2
Expanded Systematic Evidence Map for Hundreds of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Comprehensive PFAS Human Health Dashboard.扩展的数百种全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 的系统证据图谱和综合 PFAS 人类健康仪表板。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Feb;132(2):26001. doi: 10.1289/EHP13423. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Systematic Evidence Map for Over One Hundred and Fifty Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).针对超过一百五十种的全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的系统证据图谱。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 May;130(5):56001. doi: 10.1289/EHP10343. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Systematic evidence map (SEM) template: Report format and methods used for the US EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program, Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value (PPRTV) program, and other "fit for purpose" literature-based human health analyses.系统证据图谱 (SEM) 模板:美国环保署综合风险信息系统 (IRIS) 计划、暂定同行评审毒性值 (PPRTV) 计划以及其他“适用目的”的基于文献的人类健康分析中使用的报告格式和方法。
Environ Int. 2022 Nov;169:107468. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107468. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Epidemiology Evidence for Health Effects of 150 per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: A Systematic Evidence Map.流行病学证据表明 150 种全氟和多氟烷基物质对健康的影响:系统证据图谱。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Sep;130(9):96003. doi: 10.1289/EHP11185. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
The PFAS-Tox Database: A systematic evidence map of health studies on 29 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.PFAS-Tox 数据库:关于 29 种全氟和多氟烷基物质的健康研究的系统证据图谱。
Environ Int. 2022 Sep;167:107408. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107408. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
8
United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid, and Related Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 2024 Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level: Part 2 - Fifteen Misconceptions About the Health Hazards.美国环境保护局的全氟辛酸、全氟辛烷磺酸及相关全氟和多氟烷基物质2024年饮用水最大污染物水平:第2部分——关于健康危害的十五个误解
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2025;55(3):368-415. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453. Epub 2025 May 20.
9
Assembly and Curation of Lists of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to Support Environmental Science Research.全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)清单的汇编与整理,以支持环境科学研究。
Front Environ Sci. 2022 Apr 5;10:1-13. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.850019.
10
A research synthesis of humans, animals, and environmental compartments exposed to PFAS: A systematic evidence map and bibliometric analysis of secondary literature.对暴露于全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的人类、动物和环境部分的研究综合:二次文献的系统证据图谱和文献计量分析。
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108860. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108860. Epub 2024 Jun 30.