Suppr超能文献

流行病学证据表明 150 种全氟和多氟烷基物质对健康的影响:系统证据图谱。

Epidemiology Evidence for Health Effects of 150 per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: A Systematic Evidence Map.

机构信息

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Sep;130(9):96003. doi: 10.1289/EHP11185. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) comprise a large class of chemicals with widespread use and persistence in the environment and in humans; however, most of the epidemiology research has focused on a small subset.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic evidence map (SEM) is to summarize the epidemiology evidence on approximately 150 lesser studied PFAS prioritized by the EPA for tiered toxicity testing, facilitating interpretation of those results as well as identification of priorities for risk assessment and data gaps for future research.

METHODS

The Populations, Exposure, Comparators, and Outcomes (PECO) criteria were intentionally broad to identify studies of any health effects in humans with information on associations with exposure to the identified PFAS. Systematic review methods were used to search for literature that was screened using machine-learning software and manual review. Studies meeting the PECO criteria underwent quantitative data extraction and evaluation for risk of bias and sensitivity using the Integrated Risk Information System approach.

RESULTS

193 epidemiology studies were identified, which included information on 15 of the PFAS of interest. The most commonly studied health effect categories were metabolic (), endocrine (), cardiovascular (30), female reproductive (), developmental (), immune (), nervous (), male reproductive (), cancer (), and urinary () effects. In study evaluation, 120 (62%) studies were considered confidence for at least one outcome.

DISCUSSION

Most of the PFAS in this SEM have little to no epidemiology data available to inform evaluation of potential health effects. Although exposure to the 15 PFAS that had data was fairly low in most studies, these less-studied PFAS may be used as replacements for "legacy" PFAS, leading to potentially greater exposure. It is impractical to generate epidemiology evidence to fill the existing gaps for all potentially relevant PFAS. This SEM highlights some of the important research gaps that currently exist. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11185.

摘要

背景

全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 是一类化学物质,广泛应用于环境和人类中,具有持久性;然而,大多数流行病学研究都集中在一小部分物质上。

目的

本系统证据图谱 (SEM) 的目的是总结约 150 种由 EPA 优先进行分层毒性测试的研究较少的 PFAS 的流行病学证据,便于解释这些结果,并确定风险评估的优先事项和未来研究的数据空白。

方法

采用广义的人群、暴露、对照和结局 (PECO) 标准,以识别任何与所确定的 PFAS 暴露相关的人类健康影响的研究。采用系统评价方法搜索文献,使用机器学习软件和手动审查对文献进行筛选。符合 PECO 标准的研究进行定量数据提取,并使用综合风险信息系统方法评估偏倚风险和敏感性。

结果

共确定了 193 项流行病学研究,其中包括 15 种感兴趣的 PFAS 信息。研究最多的健康效应类别是代谢 (), 内分泌 (), 心血管 (30), 女性生殖 (), 发育 (), 免疫 (), 神经 (), 男性生殖 (), 癌症 (), 和泌尿 () 效应。在研究评估中,有 120 项 (62%) 研究被认为至少有一种结果具有 置信度。

讨论

本 SEM 中大多数 PFAS 的流行病学数据很少或没有,无法为评估潜在健康影响提供信息。尽管大多数研究中暴露于有数据的 15 种 PFAS 的程度较低,但这些研究较少的 PFAS 可能被用作“传统”PFAS 的替代品,从而导致潜在的更大暴露。实际情况是,不可能为所有潜在相关的 PFAS 生成流行病学证据来填补现有的空白。本 SEM 突出了目前存在的一些重要研究空白。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11185.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5c/9524599/2459c853ab54/ehp11185_f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验