Robbins-Welty Gregg, May Dakota, Shirey Kristen, Strong Cameron, Carosa Catarina, Vanderloo Carter, Hildenbrand Jordan, Vestal Heather, Riordan Paul, Yanez David, Lerebours Reginald, Niu Kathy
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s40596-025-02168-w.
The authors examined the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at improving psychiatry clerkship student clinical documentation skills.
A 1-h didactic and "gold standard" sample writings of clinical documentation were provided to psychiatry clerkship medical students rotating on an academic consultation-liaison (CL) service between July 2022 and August 2023 (intervention group). A historical comparison group of medical students, rotating between January and June 2022, did not receive the intervention. Two examples of student documentation were collected, including note 1 (N1) during week 1 and note 2 (N2) during week 2. Note quality was assessed blindly using a standardized 100-point grading rubric.
Thirty psychiatry clerkship students provided 60 examples of clinical documentation. There were no differences between N1 scores between groups. N2 mean scores were significantly greater in the intervention group over the comparison (77.4% vs 65.56%, p = 0.02). While all groups demonstrated improvement between N1 and N2, intervention groups improved significantly more than the comparison group (3.11 vs 11.7, p < 0.01). Improvements were observed most in the history of present illness, family-social history, and review of systems sub-sections. Time of year, a proxy for student experience, did not impact note scores.
Providing medical students with a didactic and examples of clinical documentation improved medical student documentation on the psychiatry clerkship.
作者研究了一项旨在提高精神科实习学生临床记录技能的教育干预措施的有效性。
2022年7月至2023年8月期间,为在学术会诊联络(CL)服务部门轮转的精神科实习医学生(干预组)提供了1小时的理论教学以及临床记录的“金标准”样例。2022年1月至6月期间轮转的医学生历史对照组未接受该干预。收集了两份学生记录示例,包括第1周的记录1(N1)和第2周的记录2(N2)。使用标准化的100分评分标准对记录质量进行盲评。
30名精神科实习学生提供了60份临床记录示例。两组之间的N1分数没有差异。干预组的N2平均分数显著高于对照组(77.4%对65.56%,p = 0.02)。虽然所有组在N1和N2之间都有提高,但干预组的提高幅度明显大于对照组(3.11对11.7,p < 0.01)。在现病史、家庭社会史和系统回顾子部分的改善最为明显。作为学生经验替代指标的一年中的时间,并未影响记录分数。
为医学生提供临床记录的理论教学和样例,可改善精神科实习中的医学生记录情况。