Suppr超能文献

硫胺素补充方案:临床驱动的合理性与生物学常识

Protocols of Thiamine Supplementation: Clinically Driven Rationality vs. Biological Commonsense.

作者信息

Bonnan Mickael

机构信息

Neurology Department, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 1 Rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000 Créteil, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 28;14(11):3787. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113787.

Abstract

Thiamine deficiency requires supplementation to prevent or reverse severe clinical complications. Are supplementation protocols correctly tailored in neurology? An examination of recommended thiamine supplementation protocols is undertaken. Recommended thiamine levels are much higher than required, reaching a median daily intake and total amount of 7.8-fold and 30.6-fold greater than the whole-body thiamine store, respectively. The high initial intake is often followed by tapering over days or weeks. Thiamine supplementation protocols in neurology mostly recommend far higher doses than those biologically required and could probably be simplified to a single 100 mg dose injected as early as possible.

摘要

硫胺素缺乏需要补充以预防或逆转严重的临床并发症。神经病学领域的补充方案是否经过正确调整?本文对推荐的硫胺素补充方案进行了研究。推荐的硫胺素水平远高于所需水平,每日摄入量中位数和总量分别比全身硫胺素储备高7.8倍和30.6倍。高初始摄入量之后通常会在数天或数周内逐渐减少。神经病学领域的硫胺素补充方案大多推荐远高于生物学所需剂量的剂量,并且可能可以简化为尽早注射单次100毫克剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c6/12156702/9569bd2622e4/jcm-14-03787-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验