Panjan Matej, Šetrajčič Dragoš Vita, Gašljević Gorana, Novaković Srdjan, Jezeršek Novaković Barbara
Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 26;26(11):5087. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115087.
Approximately 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are not cured with first-line chemoimmunotherapy, resulting in poor prognosis. Schmitz et al. classified DLBCL into four prognostic genetic groups using whole-exome sequencing. We applied a simplified approach using a targeted next-generation sequencing assay (Archer FusionPlex Lymphoma Assay) to analyze samples from 105 patients-53 with a progression-free survival (PFS) < 2 years (the "Relapse group") and 52 with a PFS > 5 years (the "Remission group") following first-line systemic treatment. Patients were classified according to Schmitz et al. into the following categories: "MCD" ( and alteration), "N1" ( alteration), "BN2" ( alteration and translocation), and "EZB" ( alteration and translocation). The predictive value of this simplified genetic classification and of relevant clinical features were evaluated. The "Relapse group" included more patients classified as MCD and N1, while fewer were classified as EZB and BN2. Also, cell-of-origin (COO) characteristics and the size of N1 aligned with the classification of Schmitz et al. However, the limited sample size precludes definitive conclusions about the predictive value of our simplified approach. Additionally, male sex, B symptoms, and bone marrow involvement were associated with relapse. Therefore, these clinical features may be useful in predicting outcomes until an effective molecular classification is widely adopted.
大约40%的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者无法通过一线化疗免疫疗法治愈,预后较差。施密茨等人使用全外显子组测序将DLBCL分为四个预后基因组。我们采用了一种简化方法,使用靶向新一代测序检测法(Archer FusionPlex淋巴瘤检测法)分析105例患者的样本——其中53例无进展生存期(PFS)<2年(“复发组”),52例PFS>5年(“缓解组”),这些患者均接受了一线全身治疗。根据施密茨等人的分类方法,将患者分为以下几类:“MCD”( 和 改变)、“N1”( 改变)、“BN2”( 改变和 易位)和“EZB”( 改变和 易位)。评估了这种简化基因分类及相关临床特征的预测价值。“复发组”中被分类为MCD和N1的患者更多,而被分类为EZB和BN2的患者较少。此外,起源细胞(COO)特征和N1的大小与施密茨等人的分类一致。然而,样本量有限,无法就我们简化方法的预测价值得出明确结论。此外,男性、B症状和骨髓受累与复发相关。因此,在有效分子分类被广泛采用之前,这些临床特征可能有助于预测预后。