El Hage Maria, Su Zhaoran, Linnebacher Michael
Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Clinic of General Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 26;26(11):5111. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115111.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the genetic mechanisms driving its development and progression. Identifying genetic mutations that affect key molecular pathways is crucial for advancing CRC diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are essential tools in precision medicine and preclinical research, aiding in the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted on the most frequently mutated genes-, , , , , and -using data from publicly available databases ( = 7894) and models from University Medicine Rostock ( = 139). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of these models in reflecting the mutational landscape observed in patient-derived samples, with a focus on both individual mutations and co-occurring mutational patterns. Our comparative analysis demonstrated that while the ranking of individual mutations remained consistent, their overall frequencies were slightly lower in the PDX models. Interestingly, we observed a notably higher prevalence of mutations in the PDX cohort. When examining co-occurring mutations, and mutations-both individually and in combination with other alterations-were the most frequent in both datasets. While the PDX models showed a greater prevalence of single mutations and a slightly higher proportion of tumors without detectable mutations compared to the public dataset, these findings present valuable insights into CRC's mutational landscape. The discrepancies highlight important considerations, such as selective engraftment bias favoring more aggressive tumors, differences in sample size between the two cohorts, and potential bottleneck effects during PDX engraftment. Understanding these factors can help refine the use of PDX models in CRC research, enhancing their potential for more accurate and relevant applications in precision oncology.
结直肠癌(CRC)仍是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,这凸显了深入了解驱动其发生和发展的遗传机制的必要性。识别影响关键分子途径的基因突变对于推进CRC的诊断、预后和治疗至关重要。患者来源的异种移植(PDX)模型是精准医学和临床前研究的重要工具,有助于制定个性化治疗策略。在本研究中,利用公开可用数据库中的数据(n = 7894)和罗斯托克大学医学中心的模型(n = 139),对最常发生突变的基因——、、、、和——进行了比较分析。本研究的目的是评估这些模型在反映患者来源样本中观察到的突变格局方面的准确性,重点关注单个突变和同时发生的突变模式。我们的比较分析表明,虽然单个突变的排名保持一致,但它们在PDX模型中的总体频率略低。有趣的是,我们在PDX队列中观察到突变的发生率明显更高。在检查同时发生的突变时,和突变——无论是单独还是与其他改变一起——在两个数据集中都是最常见的。虽然与公共数据集相比,PDX模型显示出单突变的发生率更高,且未检测到突变的肿瘤比例略高,但这些发现为CRC的突变格局提供了有价值的见解。这些差异突出了一些重要的考虑因素,如有利于更具侵袭性肿瘤的选择性植入偏差、两个队列之间样本量的差异以及PDX植入过程中的潜在瓶颈效应。了解这些因素有助于优化PDX模型在CRC研究中的应用,提高其在精准肿瘤学中更准确和相关应用的潜力。