Riley Taylor, Buchanan Zeruiah V, Perera Dila, Brickell Kate Wilhite, Turrietta Cynthia, Teal Janae, Bess Jami, Celis Margarita, Egal Hawa, Gladstone Memorie, Hernandez Betty, Prioleau Vonda, Sharif Mienah Z
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):219-230. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70015. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
Community-based doulas, who provide nonclinical perinatal support and are often from the same communities as the families they serve, are increasingly recognized as a strategy to ameliorate racialized perinatal health inequities. However, little is known about the successful implementation and sustainability of community-based doula programs.
Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, we examined the implementation and health outcomes of a community-based doula program serving low-income families and the barriers and facilitators that influence these outcomes. We analyzed programmatic and health outcome data among all families enrolled in the program from January 2016 through December 2022. Four in-depth listening sessions with the program's direct service providers were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Among the over 1800 families served, the majority of whom identified as either Asian, Black, Indigenous, Latina/e/x, or multiracial, there were 14,672 total home visits that totaled 17,774 h. Over $87,000 in direct funds and 7000 tangible items (e.g., diapers) were dispersed to families. Preterm birth ranged from 4% to 9% across programs and most participants (> 94%) were breastfeeding/chestfeeding at birth. Direct service providers identified holistic, culturally-matched services and "doula-ing the doula" (organizational infrastructure to support doulas) as facilitators. Barriers included the intersecting systems of oppression that underlie the primary challenges faced by birthing families and direct service providers, including lack of community resources and power asymmetries within birth settings, that can lead to provider burnout.
These findings document the positive impact of community-based doula programs and bolster calls for increased compensation and structural supports for doulas.
社区导乐提供非临床围产期支持,且通常与她们所服务的家庭来自同一社区,越来越被视为一种改善种族化围产期健康不平等的策略。然而,对于基于社区的导乐项目的成功实施和可持续性知之甚少。
我们采用解释性序列混合方法设计,研究了一个为低收入家庭服务的社区导乐项目的实施情况和健康结果,以及影响这些结果的障碍和促进因素。我们分析了2016年1月至2022年12月期间该项目所有登记家庭的项目数据和健康结果数据。对该项目的直接服务提供者进行了四次深入的倾听会议,并采用主题分析进行了分析。
在超过1800个服务家庭中,大多数家庭认定为亚洲、黑人、原住民、拉丁裔或多种族,总共进行了14,672次家访,总计17,774小时。超过87,000美元的直接资金和7000件实物(如尿布)分发给了家庭。各项目的早产率在4%至9%之间,大多数参与者(>94%)在出生时进行母乳喂养/胸喂。直接服务提供者将全面的、文化匹配的服务以及“支持导乐”(支持导乐的组织基础设施)视为促进因素。障碍包括分娩家庭和直接服务提供者面临的主要挑战背后相互交织的压迫系统,包括社区资源匮乏和分娩环境中的权力不对称,这可能导致提供者倦怠。
这些发现记录了基于社区的导乐项目的积极影响,并支持了增加对导乐的薪酬和结构支持的呼吁。